Development of the Reactive Aggression Assessment (RAGA-16) Part I: Item Selection and Initial Validation

Objective Severe behavioral outbursts characterized by reactive aggression (RA) are common and highly impairing for young children and their families. A growing body of research suggests RA may characterize a distinct group of youth with behavior problems; however, there is a lack of validated, RA-specific assessment tools for children. The current work presents psychometric evidence for a novel screening tool and outcome measure: the 16-item Reactive Aggression Assessment (RAGA-16).Method A nationally representative US sample (N = 1,162) of parents with children ages 5 to 19 (M = 11.4; SD = 3.98) completed an as-yet unpublished assessment of mood and behavior problems. Using this item pool, we employed two distinct test development approaches, Data-Informed vs. Automated Test Assembly (ATA), and compared the resulting scales based on multiple facets of reliability and associations with parent-reported health information.Results Both the Data-Informed and ATA-derived forms showed high reliability (rxx > .80) across a wide range of symptom severity and excellent internal consistency despite containing largely different items. The Data-Informed version showed descriptively higher detection of parent-report externalizing disorders (AUC = .76 vs. .73). Percentile and T-Score norms for scores on the Data Informed form are reported.Conclusions The Data-Informed version was selected as the final version of the RAGA-16. Having a brief, highly reliable, targeted assessment of RA with epidemiological norms allows researchers and clinicians to better characterize RA behaviors in youth. Forthcoming work will validate the RAGA-16 as a screening tool in clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2026.2697211
Primary Topic
Psychology of Development and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the Reactive Aggression Assessment (RAGA-16) Part I: Item Selection and Initial Validation

Joshua A. Langfus, Eric A. Youngstrom, Robert L. Findling, Cecil R. Reynolds
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Psychology of Development and Education
article

Development of the Reactive Aggression Assessment (RAGA-16) Part I: Item Selection and Initial Validation

Joshua A. Langfus, Eric A. Youngstrom, Robert L. Findling, Cecil R. Reynolds
article en

Abstract

Objective Severe behavioral outbursts characterized by reactive aggression (RA) are common and highly impairing for young children and their families. A growing body of research suggests RA may characterize a distinct group of youth with behavior problems; however, there is a lack of validated, RA-specific assessment tools for children. The current work presents psychometric evidence for a novel screening tool and outcome measure: the 16-item Reactive Aggression Assessment (RAGA-16).Method A nationally representative US sample (N = 1,162) of parents with children ages 5 to 19 (M = 11.4; SD = 3.98) completed an as-yet unpublished assessment of mood and behavior problems. Using this item pool, we employed two distinct test development approaches, Data-Informed vs. Automated Test Assembly (ATA), and compared the resulting scales based on multiple facets of reliability and associations with parent-reported health information.Results Both the Data-Informed and ATA-derived forms showed high reliability (rxx > .80) across a wide range of symptom severity and excellent internal consistency despite containing largely different items. The Data-Informed version showed descriptively higher detection of parent-report externalizing disorders (AUC = .76 vs. .73). Percentile and T-Score norms for scores on the Data Informed form are reported.Conclusions The Data-Informed version was selected as the final version of the RAGA-16. Having a brief, highly reliable, targeted assessment of RA with epidemiological norms allows researchers and clinicians to better characterize RA behaviors in youth. Forthcoming work will validate the RAGA-16 as a screening tool in clinical settings.

Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), University of California System (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Psychology of Development and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.