Assessment of the Representativeness and Uncertainties of CTD Temperature Profiles

CTD profilers are used as reference instruments to qualify temperature and salinity data. Their metrological specifications can be controlled in a calibration bath, and calibration coefficients can be applied to correct the linearity of sensors and the trueness of measured data with a given uncertainty. However, in ocean areas with thermal gradients, the uncertainty of the measured data is questionable due to the thermal inertia of sensors and the movements of the CTD in relation to the roll or pitch of the boat. In order to evaluate these measurement uncertainties and in order to be able to use the upcast profiles, a double C–T sensor SBE 9 profiler was fixed under a carousel water sampler, the second C–T couple being at the top of the carousel frame. This configuration allows the evaluation of the temperature measurement deviations of recorded profiles. In order to quantify the different sources of instrumental uncertainties, the temperature signal has been modelled accounting for the movements induced by the boat. The result allows one to quantify what can be called the representativeness of CTD’s temperature measurements. This notion is very useful in the data assimilation process. A table quantifying the various sources of uncertainty has been created from profiles obtained during four offshore campaigns. In the future, it could be used to find the representativeness of similar profiles obtained with a single pair of sensors. Ship-based CTD profiles are generally considered as perfect or without uncertainty in data assimilation and in the qualification per comparison of other instruments (XBT, Argo profiles, etc.). Our findings imply that this hypothesis will have to be reconsidered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Published
2025-01-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13020213
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the Representativeness and Uncertainties of CTD Temperature Profiles

Marc Le Menn, Franck Dumas, Baptiste Calvez
2 citations
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
3.59
article

Assessment of the Representativeness and Uncertainties of CTD Temperature Profiles

Marc Le Menn, Franck Dumas, Baptiste Calvez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

CTD profilers are used as reference instruments to qualify temperature and salinity data. Their metrological specifications can be controlled in a calibration bath, and calibration coefficients can be applied to correct the linearity of sensors and the trueness of measured data with a given uncertainty. However, in ocean areas with thermal gradients, the uncertainty of the measured data is questionable due to the thermal inertia of sensors and the movements of the CTD in relation to the roll or pitch of the boat. In order to evaluate these measurement uncertainties and in order to be able to use the upcast profiles, a double C–T sensor SBE 9 profiler was fixed under a carousel water sampler, the second C–T couple being at the top of the carousel frame. This configuration allows the evaluation of the temperature measurement deviations of recorded profiles. In order to quantify the different sources of instrumental uncertainties, the temperature signal has been modelled accounting for the movements induced by the boat. The result allows one to quantify what can be called the representativeness of CTD’s temperature measurements. This notion is very useful in the data assimilation process. A table quantifying the various sources of uncertainty has been created from profiles obtained during four offshore campaigns. In the future, it could be used to find the representativeness of similar profiles obtained with a single pair of sensors. Ship-based CTD profiles are generally considered as perfect or without uncertainty in data assimilation and in the qualification per comparison of other instruments (XBT, Argo profiles, etc.). Our findings imply that this hypothesis will have to be reconsidered.

Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringVol. 13(2)
Service Hydrographique et Océanographique de la Marine (FR)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
3.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.