Between-Firm Inequality and Informal Social Relations

Employer investment, social closure, peer networks: substantial research highlights differences in informal social structure across workplaces. Yet studies of pay inequality between firms have largely neglected these differences in favor of more easily measurable features like firm size or ownership structure. We show how three types of workplace social relations shape firm pay setting: employer relational investment that supports higher wages, social closure as a source of bargaining power, and amenity ties that lock workers into jobs despite low pay. To operationalize these concepts, we draw on text data from a large archive of job reviews. Variance decomposition analyses show that differences in social relations account for up to 20% of overall inequality in between-firm pay premiums and 7% of residual inequality. Differences in informal social organization, and not just formal organization, predict pay differences between firms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Sociology
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/734909
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between-Firm Inequality and Informal Social Relations

Nathan Wilmers, Di Tong, Victoria Zhang
6 citations
American Journal of Sociology
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
16.56
article

Between-Firm Inequality and Informal Social Relations

Nathan Wilmers, Di Tong, Victoria Zhang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Employer investment, social closure, peer networks: substantial research highlights differences in informal social structure across workplaces. Yet studies of pay inequality between firms have largely neglected these differences in favor of more easily measurable features like firm size or ownership structure. We show how three types of workplace social relations shape firm pay setting: employer relational investment that supports higher wages, social closure as a source of bargaining power, and amenity ties that lock workers into jobs despite low pay. To operationalize these concepts, we draw on text data from a large archive of job reviews. Variance decomposition analyses show that differences in social relations account for up to 20% of overall inequality in between-firm pay premiums and 7% of residual inequality. Differences in informal social organization, and not just formal organization, predict pay differences between firms.

American Journal of SociologyVol. 130(5)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
16.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Between-Firm Inequality and Informal Social Relations — Nathan Wilmers, Di Tong, et al. · American Journal of Sociology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS