Pengujian putusan kode etik penyelenggara pemilu dalam ranah Hukum Administrasi Negara

The Elections is carried out based on the standard provisions of the Law and the Code of Ethics for the Implementation of Elections. According to the Indonesian electoral Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning Elections, the elements of the Election Organizer consist of the General Election Commission, the Election Supervisory Body and the Election Organizer Honorary Council which are a unified function of organizing elections. The role of the Election Organizer is highly demanded for its ability to implement the regulations of the election stages by heeding the Election Organizer Code of. The integrity and quality of the election are determined by the compliance of the election organizers in fulfilling the principles and ethics of election organizers as the basic formula for the formulation of the Election Organizer Code of Ethics, so that the enforcement of the Election Organizer Code of Ethics (rule of ethics) is a necessity in our democratic system. DKPP is authorized by law to carry out the function of maintaining the integrity, independence and credibility of the Election Organizer. DKPP can impose ethical sanctions on election organizers from warning sanctions to permanent dismissal of election organizers with the power of its decision instrument which was originally final and binding (Article 458 paragraph 3 of the Election Law). The provision of final and binding nature has been tested in the Constitutional Court in PUU case No. 32/PUU-XIX/2021 jo. No. 31/PUU-XI/2013, and then authorized the State Administrative Court to be able to test DKPP decisions. Thus, corrections to DKPP's ethical decisions can already be tested through the means of enforcing state administrative law (administrative law) with PTUN (beschikking) which is expanded so that it requires adjustments to the norms of the State Administrative Court Procedure Law.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Normatif
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54123/jn.v4i2.396
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pengujian putusan kode etik penyelenggara pemilu dalam ranah Hukum Administrasi Negara

Agussyah Ramadani Damanik
Jurnal Normatif
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Pengujian putusan kode etik penyelenggara pemilu dalam ranah Hukum Administrasi Negara

Agussyah Ramadani Damanik
article en

Abstract

The Elections is carried out based on the standard provisions of the Law and the Code of Ethics for the Implementation of Elections. According to the Indonesian electoral Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning Elections, the elements of the Election Organizer consist of the General Election Commission, the Election Supervisory Body and the Election Organizer Honorary Council which are a unified function of organizing elections. The role of the Election Organizer is highly demanded for its ability to implement the regulations of the election stages by heeding the Election Organizer Code of. The integrity and quality of the election are determined by the compliance of the election organizers in fulfilling the principles and ethics of election organizers as the basic formula for the formulation of the Election Organizer Code of Ethics, so that the enforcement of the Election Organizer Code of Ethics (rule of ethics) is a necessity in our democratic system. DKPP is authorized by law to carry out the function of maintaining the integrity, independence and credibility of the Election Organizer. DKPP can impose ethical sanctions on election organizers from warning sanctions to permanent dismissal of election organizers with the power of its decision instrument which was originally final and binding (Article 458 paragraph 3 of the Election Law). The provision of final and binding nature has been tested in the Constitutional Court in PUU case No. 32/PUU-XIX/2021 jo. No. 31/PUU-XI/2013, and then authorized the State Administrative Court to be able to test DKPP decisions. Thus, corrections to DKPP's ethical decisions can already be tested through the means of enforcing state administrative law (administrative law) with PTUN (beschikking) which is expanded so that it requires adjustments to the norms of the State Administrative Court Procedure Law.

Jurnal NormatifVol. 4(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.