Towards sustainable chemical process design: Revisiting the integration of life cycle assessment

Life-cycle assessment (LCA) is essential for sustainable chemical process design. However, current integrations treat LCA as a top-level environmental assessment tool, risking superficial integration and perpetuating conventional process design assumptions. This contribution reviews how LCA is integrated with model-based chemical process design. It focuses on current practices, challenges in goal and scope, modelling, computational, and interpretation integration, and discusses the integration of LCA's core features alongside profit-driven assumptions. The contribution identified more than 100 articles via a hybrid search method and reviewed 53 based on a saturation curve, resulting in 25 metrics to assess process design and LCA integration. To assist practitioners, a comprehensive classification of computational integrations is provided. The review highlights the following gaps: most studies (74%) focus only on cradle-to-gate phases, neglect use and end-of-life phases (89%) and do not define the function (92%). However, including a user function perspective could enhance the integration of use and end-of-life scenarios, supporting circular strategies and sufficiency measures. Additionally, environmental externalities are systematically excluded during model linkage, and most studies concentrate on energy utilities (75%) and material inputs (70%), whereas emissions (26%), waste, and wastewater (25%) are frequently overlooked, which emphasises the dominance of economic factors in current design studies. • Detailed overview of LCA and chemical process design integration. • Computational integration support for practitioners. • Modelling and linking challenges when accounting for externalities. • Designing for circularity, end-of-life, and use by integrating function perspective. • Contextualising integration in paradigm shift towards sustainable process design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144831
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards sustainable chemical process design: Revisiting the integration of life cycle assessment

Bernhard Steubing, Christian Hoffmann, Martina G. Vijver, Bartolomeus Häussling Löwgren et al.
7 citations
Journal of Cleaner Production
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
6.02
article

Towards sustainable chemical process design: Revisiting the integration of life cycle assessment

Bernhard Steubing, Christian Hoffmann, Martina G. Vijver, Bartolomeus Häussling Löwgren, Giuseppe Cardellini
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Life-cycle assessment (LCA) is essential for sustainable chemical process design. However, current integrations treat LCA as a top-level environmental assessment tool, risking superficial integration and perpetuating conventional process design assumptions. This contribution reviews how LCA is integrated with model-based chemical process design. It focuses on current practices, challenges in goal and scope, modelling, computational, and interpretation integration, and discusses the integration of LCA's core features alongside profit-driven assumptions. The contribution identified more than 100 articles via a hybrid search method and reviewed 53 based on a saturation curve, resulting in 25 metrics to assess process design and LCA integration. To assist practitioners, a comprehensive classification of computational integrations is provided. The review highlights the following gaps: most studies (74%) focus only on cradle-to-gate phases, neglect use and end-of-life phases (89%) and do not define the function (92%). However, including a user function perspective could enhance the integration of use and end-of-life scenarios, supporting circular strategies and sufficiency measures. Additionally, environmental externalities are systematically excluded during model linkage, and most studies concentrate on energy utilities (75%) and material inputs (70%), whereas emissions (26%), waste, and wastewater (25%) are frequently overlooked, which emphasises the dominance of economic factors in current design studies. • Detailed overview of LCA and chemical process design integration. • Computational integration support for practitioners. • Modelling and linking challenges when accounting for externalities. • Designing for circularity, end-of-life, and use by integrating function perspective. • Contextualising integration in paradigm shift towards sustainable process design.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 491
Leiden University (NL), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Flemish Institute for Technological Research (BE)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
6.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.