Diagnostic impact of DNA methylation classification in adult and pediatric CNS tumors

Over the past decade, neuropathological diagnosis has undergone significant changes, integrating morphological features with molecular biomarkers. The molecular era has successfully refined neuropathological diagnostic accuracy; however, a substantial number of CNS tumor diagnoses remain challenging, particularly in children. DNA methylation classification has emerged as a powerful machine learning approach for clinical decision-making in CNS tumors. The aim of this study is to share our experience using DNA methylation classification in daily routine practice, illustrated through clinical cases. We employed a classification system to evaluate discrepancies between histo-molecular and DNA methylation diagnoses, with a specific focus on adult versus pediatric CNS tumors. In our study, we observed that 40% of cases fell into Class I, 47% into Class II, and 13% into Class III among the "matched cases" (≥ 0.84). In other words, DNA methylation classification confirmed morphological diagnoses in 63% of adult and 23% of pediatric cases. Refinement of diagnosis was particularly evident in the pediatric population (65% vs. 21% for the adult population, p = 0.006). Additionally, we discussed cases classified with low calibrated scores. In conclusion, our study confirms that DNA methylation classification provides significant added-value for CNS tumors diagnosis, particularly in pediatric cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87079-4
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic impact of DNA methylation classification in adult and pediatric CNS tumors

Olivier De Witte, Nathalie Gilis, Ștefan Rusu, Nicky D’Haene et al.
10 citations
Scientific Reports
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
16.25
article

Diagnostic impact of DNA methylation classification in adult and pediatric CNS tumors

Olivier De Witte, Nathalie Gilis, Ștefan Rusu, Nicky D’Haene, Khaoula Alaoui Slimani, Isabelle Salmon, Laetitia Lebrun, Fabienne Escande, Manon Dausort, Claude Alain Maurage, Florence Lefranc, Chloé Gillard
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Over the past decade, neuropathological diagnosis has undergone significant changes, integrating morphological features with molecular biomarkers. The molecular era has successfully refined neuropathological diagnostic accuracy; however, a substantial number of CNS tumor diagnoses remain challenging, particularly in children. DNA methylation classification has emerged as a powerful machine learning approach for clinical decision-making in CNS tumors. The aim of this study is to share our experience using DNA methylation classification in daily routine practice, illustrated through clinical cases. We employed a classification system to evaluate discrepancies between histo-molecular and DNA methylation diagnoses, with a specific focus on adult versus pediatric CNS tumors. In our study, we observed that 40% of cases fell into Class I, 47% into Class II, and 13% into Class III among the "matched cases" (≥ 0.84). In other words, DNA methylation classification confirmed morphological diagnoses in 63% of adult and 23% of pediatric cases. Refinement of diagnosis was particularly evident in the pediatric population (65% vs. 21% for the adult population, p = 0.006). Additionally, we discussed cases classified with low calibrated scores. In conclusion, our study confirms that DNA methylation classification provides significant added-value for CNS tumors diagnosis, particularly in pediatric cases.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Inserm (FR), Université de Lille (FR), Erasmus Hospital (BE), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR), Grand Charleroi Hospital (BE), Institut de Biologie de Lille (FR)
Fonds Erasme
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
16.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.