Chemical pure reaction automata in maximally parallel manner

Abstract This work presents a new class of reaction automata, called Chemical Pure Reaction Automata (CPRA). CPRA combines characteristics of chemical reaction automata, as introduced by Okubo et al. in 2016, with those of the more recently defined pure reaction automata. Unlike standard chemical reaction automata, CPRA lack permanence, meaning their result states consist solely of the reaction products, with unconsumed reactants being discarded. We investigate the computational power of two CPRA variants, both working in a maximally parallel manner. We first prove that deterministic CPRA (DCPRA)—in which at every state, for each input symbol, the resulting state is the same for all multisets of enabled reactions—are not Turing complete. We then show that non-deterministic CPRA are Turing complete and thus strictly more powerful than DCPRA: namely, the set of languages accepted by CPRA in the maximally parallel manner contains the set of languages accepted by standard chemical reaction automata in the same manner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Membrane Computing
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41965-024-00176-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
DNA and Biological Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chemical pure reaction automata in maximally parallel manner

Luca Manzoni, Giulia Bernardini, Rocco Ascone, Francesco Leiter
1 citations
Journal of Membrane Computing
DNA and Biological Computing
0.81
article

Chemical pure reaction automata in maximally parallel manner

Luca Manzoni, Giulia Bernardini, Rocco Ascone, Francesco Leiter
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This work presents a new class of reaction automata, called Chemical Pure Reaction Automata (CPRA). CPRA combines characteristics of chemical reaction automata, as introduced by Okubo et al. in 2016, with those of the more recently defined pure reaction automata. Unlike standard chemical reaction automata, CPRA lack permanence, meaning their result states consist solely of the reaction products, with unconsumed reactants being discarded. We investigate the computational power of two CPRA variants, both working in a maximally parallel manner. We first prove that deterministic CPRA (DCPRA)—in which at every state, for each input symbol, the resulting state is the same for all multisets of enabled reactions—are not Turing complete. We then show that non-deterministic CPRA are Turing complete and thus strictly more powerful than DCPRA: namely, the set of languages accepted by CPRA in the maximally parallel manner contains the set of languages accepted by standard chemical reaction automata in the same manner.

Journal of Membrane ComputingVol. 7(4)
University of Trieste (IT)
Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica "Francesco Severi", Università degli Studi di Trieste, Gruppo Nazionale per il Calcolo Scientifico
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
DNA and Biological Computing
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Chemical pure reaction automata in maximally parallel manner — Luca Manzoni, Giulia Bernardini, et al. · Journal of Membrane Computing (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS