Voice, Rhyme, and Aesthetic Injustice

Abstract Some lines of poetry rhyme to certain readers and not to others because of how their words are pronounced in different accents. And because the accent in which a person speaks is tied in significant ways to aspects of their social identity (such as their age, race, gender, and class), some poems rhyme in the voices of the privileged and not in the voices of the disadvantaged. This paper argues that appreciators can incur aesthetic harms when they are excluded from participating in aesthetic goods that are more fully available to others, and that these harms can constitute aesthetic injustices when they are part of a wider pattern of socio-economic hardship. Poems that embody objectionable gatekeeping practices can thus perpetuate aesthetic injustice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Aesthetics
Published
2024-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayae051
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Voice, Rhyme, and Aesthetic Injustice

Tom Roberts
3 citations
The British Journal of Aesthetics
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
12.87
article

Voice, Rhyme, and Aesthetic Injustice

Tom Roberts
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Some lines of poetry rhyme to certain readers and not to others because of how their words are pronounced in different accents. And because the accent in which a person speaks is tied in significant ways to aspects of their social identity (such as their age, race, gender, and class), some poems rhyme in the voices of the privileged and not in the voices of the disadvantaged. This paper argues that appreciators can incur aesthetic harms when they are excluded from participating in aesthetic goods that are more fully available to others, and that these harms can constitute aesthetic injustices when they are part of a wider pattern of socio-economic hardship. Poems that embody objectionable gatekeeping practices can thus perpetuate aesthetic injustice.

The British Journal of AestheticsVol. 65(3)
University of Exeter (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
12.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.