An opportunistic observational study of hospital switchboard hold messages, hold music and time spent waiting

Numerous callers contact hospital switchboards, many repeatedly. Recorded switchboard messages have broad reach. We sampled outgoing calls from our regional infectious diseases service to other hospital switchboards over a 3-month period. Wait times varied substantially. Two calls were cut off unanswered. Recorded messages commonly covered infection control precautions for visitors, visiting rules, and guidance regarding calling for medical advice. At least one message was out of date. Another advised unwell people not to visit the hospital. We followed up our sample with freedom of information requests, focusing on call volume data and policies regarding switchboard systems and messaging. Many policies were informal. Overall, the user experience varied substantially between hospitals. Messaging policies appeared to have little regard to messages' relevance, utility and impact. Calling a hospital switchboard is a common, non-biomedical task that would benefit from substantial effort to establish and promote best practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Healthcare Journal
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100224
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An opportunistic observational study of hospital switchboard hold messages, hold music and time spent waiting

Jordan P. Skittrall, Mary D Fortune
1 citations
Future Healthcare Journal
Team Dynamics and Performance
2.44
article

An opportunistic observational study of hospital switchboard hold messages, hold music and time spent waiting

Jordan P. Skittrall, Mary D Fortune
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Numerous callers contact hospital switchboards, many repeatedly. Recorded switchboard messages have broad reach. We sampled outgoing calls from our regional infectious diseases service to other hospital switchboards over a 3-month period. Wait times varied substantially. Two calls were cut off unanswered. Recorded messages commonly covered infection control precautions for visitors, visiting rules, and guidance regarding calling for medical advice. At least one message was out of date. Another advised unwell people not to visit the hospital. We followed up our sample with freedom of information requests, focusing on call volume data and policies regarding switchboard systems and messaging. Many policies were informal. Overall, the user experience varied substantially between hospitals. Messaging policies appeared to have little regard to messages' relevance, utility and impact. Calling a hospital switchboard is a common, non-biomedical task that would benefit from substantial effort to establish and promote best practice.

Future Healthcare JournalVol. 12(1)
University of Cambridge (GB), Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Team Dynamics and Performance
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An opportunistic observational study of hospital switchboard hold messages, hold music and time spent waiting — Jordan P. Skittrall, Mary D Fortune · Future Healthcare Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS