Leveraging Acoustic Features and Deep Neural Architectures for Audio Deepfake Detection

This research presents a comparative analysis of various audio features and high-level architectures for deefake detection with emphasis on computational efficiency. Several light-weight models are proposed as opposed to GAN-based approaches in literature for evaluating custom-generated deep-fakes. The model is trained on Fake or Real dataset and achieved commendable performance using MFCC-Conformer and MFCC-LSTM feature-model combinations by achieving 87.61% and 87.52% accuracy, respectively. Specifically, the MFCC-Conformer recorded a TN of 526 and a FN of 18, along with an AUC score of 0.96, while the MFCC-DenseNet achieved a TN of 535, an FN of 9, and an AUC score of 0.96, underscoring their effectiveness in identifying fake audios. The outcomes underscore the effectiveness of the proposed models in combating the proliferation of misleading media content.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icacc63692.2024.10845392
Primary Topic
Music and Audio Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging Acoustic Features and Deep Neural Architectures for Audio Deepfake Detection

Vikram Sundaram, S. Babitha, Susmitha Vekkot
Music and Audio Processing
article

Leveraging Acoustic Features and Deep Neural Architectures for Audio Deepfake Detection

Vikram Sundaram, S. Babitha, Susmitha Vekkot
article en

Abstract

This research presents a comparative analysis of various audio features and high-level architectures for deefake detection with emphasis on computational efficiency. Several light-weight models are proposed as opposed to GAN-based approaches in literature for evaluating custom-generated deep-fakes. The model is trained on Fake or Real dataset and achieved commendable performance using MFCC-Conformer and MFCC-LSTM feature-model combinations by achieving 87.61% and 87.52% accuracy, respectively. Specifically, the MFCC-Conformer recorded a TN of 526 and a FN of 18, along with an AUC score of 0.96, while the MFCC-DenseNet achieved a TN of 535, an FN of 9, and an AUC score of 0.96, underscoring their effectiveness in identifying fake audios. The outcomes underscore the effectiveness of the proposed models in combating the proliferation of misleading media content.

Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Music and Audio Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Leveraging Acoustic Features and Deep Neural Architectures for Audio Deepfake Detection — Vikram Sundaram, S. Babitha, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS