Mean-reverting Prices and Losses in Liquidity Pools

With the proliferation of decentralised finance (DeFi) protocols AMMs (automated market makers) on blockchains have also gained momentum in the past few years. This is mostly attributable to the fact that they require much weaker trust assumptions than centralised exchanges (CEXs) and that they can be utilised anonymously without requiring their users to go through a know-your-customer process. The decentralised nature of AMMs brings in some caveats, among which is the intensively researched loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR) metric, which is the dollar amount a liquidity pool (LP) loses in one unit of time compared to a rebalancing strategy that executes the same trades on CEXs. In this work, we adopt the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck stochastic differential equation to account for uncertain movements in the spot price, develop a discrete-time simulator and gauge the LVR metrics of constant function market makers (CFMMs). We demonstrate that the relative amount of losses is not as large as one would expect at first glance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bcca62388.2024.10844419
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mean-reverting Prices and Losses in Liquidity Pools

Bence Ladóczki
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Mean-reverting Prices and Losses in Liquidity Pools

Bence Ladóczki
article en

Abstract

With the proliferation of decentralised finance (DeFi) protocols AMMs (automated market makers) on blockchains have also gained momentum in the past few years. This is mostly attributable to the fact that they require much weaker trust assumptions than centralised exchanges (CEXs) and that they can be utilised anonymously without requiring their users to go through a know-your-customer process. The decentralised nature of AMMs brings in some caveats, among which is the intensively researched loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR) metric, which is the dollar amount a liquidity pool (LP) loses in one unit of time compared to a rebalancing strategy that executes the same trades on CEXs. In this work, we adopt the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck stochastic differential equation to account for uncertain movements in the spot price, develop a discrete-time simulator and gauge the LVR metrics of constant function market makers (CFMMs). We demonstrate that the relative amount of losses is not as large as one would expect at first glance.

Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU)
Innovation Fund
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.