Discordance and Performance of the ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT High Bleeding Risk Definitions After Coronary Stenting
There was substantial discordance in the categorization of high bleeding risk between the ARC-HBR definition and the PRECISE-DAPT score. Both tools identified patients at increased bleeding risk, but those patients also had increased ischemic risk. The PRECISE-DAPT score underestimated bleeding risk. Guideline-recommended high bleeding risk definitions may not be generalizable across patient populations, and refined scoring systems are needed.
Authors
- Tomas Jernberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1695-379X)
- Peter Ueda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3275-8743)
- Carl-Emil Lim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0501-9678)
- Björn Pasternak (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2097-8466)
- Gustaf Edgren (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2198-4745)
- Moa Simonsson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3775-0839)
Institutions
- Statens Serum Institut (DK)
- Danderyds sjukhus (SE)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Stockholm South General Hospital (SE)
- Glanrhyd Hospital (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
- Published
- 2025-01-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.032
- Citations
- 8
- Primary Topic
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 16.05
Funders
- Riksförbundet HjärtLung
- Vetenskapsrådet