MONTE CARLO EVALUATION OF WHITE'S TEST FOR DETECTING HETEROSCEDASTICITY IN GENERALIZED LINEAR MODELS

Heteroscedasticity in regression analysis occurs when the variance of the error term changes across different levels of the independent variable(s), leading to inefficient estimates and incorrect inference. In Generalized Linear Models (GLMs), heteroscedasticity significantly impacts prediction and inference accuracy. This study evaluates White's test for detecting heteroscedasticity in GLMs through Monte Carlo simulations. We investigate the test's power, Type II errors, and Type I errors at different sample sizes (100, 250, and 500). Our findings reveal that White test performs well in detecting strong heteroscedasticity, particularly for exponential heteroscedasticity structures (EHS), but poorly for weaker forms like linear heteroscedasticity structures (LHS) and square root heteroscedasticity structures (SQRTHS). While increased sample size enhances performance, the test remains susceptible to over-rejection of homoscedasticity. We recommend cautious use, especially with weaker heteroscedasticity or specific structures. For improved performance, use the test with moderate to high sample sizes (e.g., n = 500), particularly for EHS and quadratic heteroscedasticity structures (QHS). Alternative tests may be considered for researchers with limited sample sizes or dealing with LHS and SQRTHS. Finally, we emphasize the importance of assessing the underlying structure of heteroscedasticity in the dataset to choose the most suitable test and interpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FUDMA Journal of Sciences
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2024-0806-3040
Primary Topic
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MONTE CARLO EVALUATION OF WHITE'S TEST FOR DETECTING HETEROSCEDASTICITY IN GENERALIZED LINEAR MODELS

Auwalu Ibrahim, Ann Osi, S. M. Umar, Umaru Musa et al.
FUDMA Journal of Sciences
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
article

MONTE CARLO EVALUATION OF WHITE'S TEST FOR DETECTING HETEROSCEDASTICITY IN GENERALIZED LINEAR MODELS

Auwalu Ibrahim, Ann Osi, S. M. Umar, Umaru Musa, Habeebullah O. Akewugberu, O. O. Ishaaq, A. F. Ganiyat
article en

Abstract

Heteroscedasticity in regression analysis occurs when the variance of the error term changes across different levels of the independent variable(s), leading to inefficient estimates and incorrect inference. In Generalized Linear Models (GLMs), heteroscedasticity significantly impacts prediction and inference accuracy. This study evaluates White's test for detecting heteroscedasticity in GLMs through Monte Carlo simulations. We investigate the test's power, Type II errors, and Type I errors at different sample sizes (100, 250, and 500). Our findings reveal that White test performs well in detecting strong heteroscedasticity, particularly for exponential heteroscedasticity structures (EHS), but poorly for weaker forms like linear heteroscedasticity structures (LHS) and square root heteroscedasticity structures (SQRTHS). While increased sample size enhances performance, the test remains susceptible to over-rejection of homoscedasticity. We recommend cautious use, especially with weaker heteroscedasticity or specific structures. For improved performance, use the test with moderate to high sample sizes (e.g., n = 500), particularly for EHS and quadratic heteroscedasticity structures (QHS). Alternative tests may be considered for researchers with limited sample sizes or dealing with LHS and SQRTHS. Finally, we emphasize the importance of assessing the underlying structure of heteroscedasticity in the dataset to choose the most suitable test and interpretation.

FUDMA Journal of SciencesVol. 8(6)
Kano State University of Technology (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.