Mental Models of Leaders in Ambidextrous Leadership

To remain competitive, businesses must continuously adapt by exploring new markets and ex-ploiting existing ones, which require different, often paradoxical, cognitive processes from leaders.Ambidextrous leadership has emerged as a framework for managing these competing demands.Effective ambidextrous leaders balance the opposing needs of exploration and exploitation through distinct cognitive patterns, exhibiting either opening or closing behaviors.Understanding the mental models of such leaders can offer insights into how they navigate these paradoxes.This study examines the mental models of ambidextrous leaders using ZMET, through interviews with 17 leaders from German SMEs.The consensus model reveals how leaders' cognition is influenced by their organizational context and by its goals and values.Within this framework, leaders adopt strategies to balance paradoxical demands, with the restriction of the scale of innovation and the individual consideration of employees as main strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v15-i1/24350
Primary Topic
Education and Professional Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mental Models of Leaders in Ambidextrous Leadership

Hannah Vergossen
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Education and Professional Development
article

Mental Models of Leaders in Ambidextrous Leadership

Hannah Vergossen
article en

Abstract

To remain competitive, businesses must continuously adapt by exploring new markets and ex-ploiting existing ones, which require different, often paradoxical, cognitive processes from leaders.Ambidextrous leadership has emerged as a framework for managing these competing demands.Effective ambidextrous leaders balance the opposing needs of exploration and exploitation through distinct cognitive patterns, exhibiting either opening or closing behaviors.Understanding the mental models of such leaders can offer insights into how they navigate these paradoxes.This study examines the mental models of ambidextrous leaders using ZMET, through interviews with 17 leaders from German SMEs.The consensus model reveals how leaders' cognition is influenced by their organizational context and by its goals and values.Within this framework, leaders adopt strategies to balance paradoxical demands, with the restriction of the scale of innovation and the individual consideration of employees as main strategies.

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social SciencesVol. 15(1)
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Education and Professional Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.