Outcome Analysis of COVID 19 Patients Using ISARIC/WHO 4C Mortality Score in COVID Unit of Bangladesh Institute of Tropical and Infectious Diseases (BITID)

Background: ISARIC/WHO 4C Mortality Score is a risk stratification tool that helps predict the in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients. However, this tool was developed and validated in a British population, and thus, the external validation of this tool in local populations is important. This study aimed to analyze the outcome of COVID 19 patients using 4C Mortality Score in the COVID unit of Bangladesh Institute of Tropical and Infectious Diseases (BITID) Chattogram. Materials and methods: This hospital-based prospective observational study included 115 admitted adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 by RTPCR method. Patients under age of 18 and those with missing data in any of the components of ISARIC 4C score were excluded from study. Relevant sociodemographic and clinical data were collected, and the 4C mortality score was calculated at admission. Outcome measures were need for oxygen therapy, mode of oxygen therapy, and in-hospital mortality. Results: Mean age of the patients was 50.6±18.4 years in the present study and 47.8% were male. The median ISARIC 4C mortality score was 7.0 (Interquartile range: 3-12) and at the time of admission 31 (27%), 34 (29.6%), 33 (28.7%), and 17 (14.8%) patients were in low, intermediate, high, and very-high risk groups, respectively. The mortality was 10.4%, the area under the curve of the score was 0.921 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.868-0.974, p < 0.001) and the cutoff value correctly classified 83.5% of the patients. The cutoff value of >11 had sensitivity, 91.67% (95% CI: 61.52-99.79); specificity, 82.52% (95% CI: 73.79-89.30), positive predictive value, 37.93% (95% CI: 20.69-57.74), and negative predictive value, 98.84% (95% CI: 93.69-99.97). There was a significant moderate positive correlation between admission 4C mortality score and length of stay in hospital for the surviving patients (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.514, p<0.001). Conclusion: The ISARIC score was found to have excellent predictive ability for mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in our Bangladeshi cohort. Despite recent advances in the treatment and management of adults hospitalized with COVID-19, 4C mortality score can continue to inform clinical decision making. Chatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J; Vol.23 (1); January 2024; Page 61-67

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chattagram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College Journal
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3329/cmoshmcj.v23i1.78390
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcome Analysis of COVID 19 Patients Using ISARIC/WHO 4C Mortality Score in COVID Unit of Bangladesh Institute of Tropical and Infectious Diseases (BITID)

Farzin Akhter, Tabassum Ferdousi, Hasina Nasreen, Shakeel Ahmed et al.
Chattagram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College Journal
Diverse Scientific Research Studies
article

Outcome Analysis of COVID 19 Patients Using ISARIC/WHO 4C Mortality Score in COVID Unit of Bangladesh Institute of Tropical and Infectious Diseases (BITID)

Farzin Akhter, Tabassum Ferdousi, Hasina Nasreen, Shakeel Ahmed, S. Mahmud, Md Mamunur Rashid, Nayema Masrura
article en

Abstract

Background: ISARIC/WHO 4C Mortality Score is a risk stratification tool that helps predict the in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients. However, this tool was developed and validated in a British population, and thus, the external validation of this tool in local populations is important. This study aimed to analyze the outcome of COVID 19 patients using 4C Mortality Score in the COVID unit of Bangladesh Institute of Tropical and Infectious Diseases (BITID) Chattogram. Materials and methods: This hospital-based prospective observational study included 115 admitted adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 by RTPCR method. Patients under age of 18 and those with missing data in any of the components of ISARIC 4C score were excluded from study. Relevant sociodemographic and clinical data were collected, and the 4C mortality score was calculated at admission. Outcome measures were need for oxygen therapy, mode of oxygen therapy, and in-hospital mortality. Results: Mean age of the patients was 50.6±18.4 years in the present study and 47.8% were male. The median ISARIC 4C mortality score was 7.0 (Interquartile range: 3-12) and at the time of admission 31 (27%), 34 (29.6%), 33 (28.7%), and 17 (14.8%) patients were in low, intermediate, high, and very-high risk groups, respectively. The mortality was 10.4%, the area under the curve of the score was 0.921 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.868-0.974, p < 0.001) and the cutoff value correctly classified 83.5% of the patients. The cutoff value of >11 had sensitivity, 91.67% (95% CI: 61.52-99.79); specificity, 82.52% (95% CI: 73.79-89.30), positive predictive value, 37.93% (95% CI: 20.69-57.74), and negative predictive value, 98.84% (95% CI: 93.69-99.97). There was a significant moderate positive correlation between admission 4C mortality score and length of stay in hospital for the surviving patients (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.514, p<0.001). Conclusion: The ISARIC score was found to have excellent predictive ability for mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in our Bangladeshi cohort. Despite recent advances in the treatment and management of adults hospitalized with COVID-19, 4C mortality score can continue to inform clinical decision making. Chatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J; Vol.23 (1); January 2024; Page 61-67

Chattagram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College JournalVol. 23(1)
Chittagong Medical College (BD), Hospital for Tropical Diseases (VN), University of Chittagong (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Diverse Scientific Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.