Not all emotions are the same: an intersectional analysis of women’s political action based on emotive responses

If there was ever a time in US history to understand women’s politics, that time is certainly now, as with the increase of women candidates, the rise of women’s political engagement, and women-led social movements, scholars have little intersectional insight into what motivates women’s political participation. Anger and fear are powerful forces in US politics, yet how negative emotions about race matter for women is less understood. Using the 2020 Collaborative Multiracial Postelection Survey, we find that fear about race is associated with engagement in costlier political acts. Women’s anger about race leads to more frequent non-electoral political engagement once accounting for time, money, and civic skills. No one emotion has the same effect on women’s non-electoral political participation. Not all women are similar in their emotional responses to race, which impacts how women look to political systems to address racial issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Politics and Gender
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/25151088y2024d000000073
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not all emotions are the same: an intersectional analysis of women’s political action based on emotive responses

Kennia L. Coronado, Nadia E. Brown, Christine Slaughter, Camille Burge-Hicks
2 citations
European Journal of Politics and Gender
Gender Politics and Representation
7.73
article

Not all emotions are the same: an intersectional analysis of women’s political action based on emotive responses

Kennia L. Coronado, Nadia E. Brown, Christine Slaughter, Camille Burge-Hicks
article en
2 citations

Abstract

If there was ever a time in US history to understand women’s politics, that time is certainly now, as with the increase of women candidates, the rise of women’s political engagement, and women-led social movements, scholars have little intersectional insight into what motivates women’s political participation. Anger and fear are powerful forces in US politics, yet how negative emotions about race matter for women is less understood. Using the 2020 Collaborative Multiracial Postelection Survey, we find that fear about race is associated with engagement in costlier political acts. Women’s anger about race leads to more frequent non-electoral political engagement once accounting for time, money, and civic skills. No one emotion has the same effect on women’s non-electoral political participation. Not all women are similar in their emotional responses to race, which impacts how women look to political systems to address racial issues.

European Journal of Politics and GenderVol. 8(2)
Boston University (US), Texas Woman's University (US), Georgetown University (US), Villanova University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gender Politics and Representation
7.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Not all emotions are the same: an intersectional analysis of women’s political action based on emotive responses — Kennia L. Coronado, Nadia E. Brown, et al. · European Journal of Politics and Gender (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS