The main narratives of relations between circumpolar states in modern geopolitics

The Arctic is attracting increasing attention from both governments and academia. Some of the region’s most distinctive environmental, security, and economic features are undergoing significant changes. Each Arctic state rightly develops its own strategy for relationships with its neighbors and other stakeholders in the region. In this paper, we will try to examine and analyze how these relationships have changed over time, depending on the state and development of international relations in the world. Particular attention is paid to events that occurred in the world before and after 2014. It was during this period that unfriendly states continued to escalate and complicate the international situation and relations with the Russian Federation, using sanctions and other dubious instruments. Despite the complexities of the state of world politics, the Arctic territory should remain open to cooperation between states interested in this region. We are confident that the Arctic should remain a territory of peace and international dialogue, and we very much hope that in the future of international relations everything will develop this way.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Arctic XXI century Humanities
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25587/2310-5453-2024-4-144-163
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The main narratives of relations between circumpolar states in modern geopolitics

A. V. Mitko, V. K. Sidorov
1 citations
The Arctic XXI century Humanities
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
4.20
article

The main narratives of relations between circumpolar states in modern geopolitics

A. V. Mitko, V. K. Sidorov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Arctic is attracting increasing attention from both governments and academia. Some of the region’s most distinctive environmental, security, and economic features are undergoing significant changes. Each Arctic state rightly develops its own strategy for relationships with its neighbors and other stakeholders in the region. In this paper, we will try to examine and analyze how these relationships have changed over time, depending on the state and development of international relations in the world. Particular attention is paid to events that occurred in the world before and after 2014. It was during this period that unfriendly states continued to escalate and complicate the international situation and relations with the Russian Federation, using sanctions and other dubious instruments. Despite the complexities of the state of world politics, the Arctic territory should remain open to cooperation between states interested in this region. We are confident that the Arctic should remain a territory of peace and international dialogue, and we very much hope that in the future of international relations everything will develop this way.

The Arctic XXI century Humanities(4)
Academy of the State Fire Service EMERCOM of Russia (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.