Advancements and opportunities to improve bottom–up estimates of global wetland methane emissions
Abstract Wetlands are the single largest natural source of atmospheric methane (CH 4 ), contributing approximately 30% of total surface CH 4 emissions, and they have been identified as the largest source of uncertainty in the global CH 4 budget based on the most recent Global Carbon Project CH 4 report. High uncertainties in the bottom–up estimates of wetland CH 4 emissions pose significant challenges for accurately understanding their spatiotemporal variations, and for the scientific community to monitor wetland CH 4 emissions from space. In fact, there are large disagreements between bottom–up estimates versus top–down estimates inferred from inversion of atmospheric CH 4 concentrations. To address these critical gaps, we review recent development, validation, and applications of bottom–up estimates of global wetland CH 4 emissions, as well as how they are used in top–down inversions. These bottom–up estimates, using (1) empirical biogeochemical modeling (e.g. WetCHARTs: 125–208 TgCH 4 yr −1 ); (2) process-based biogeochemical modeling (e.g. WETCHIMP: 190 ± 39 TgCH 4 yr −1 ); and (3) data-driven machine learning approach (e.g. UpCH4: 146 ± 43 TgCH 4 yr −1 ). Bottom–up estimates are subject to significant uncertainties (∼80 Tg CH 4 yr −1 ), and the ranges of different estimates do not overlap, further amplifying the overall uncertainty when combining multiple data products. These substantial uncertainties highlight gaps in our understanding of wetland CH 4 biogeochemistry and wetland inundation dynamics. Major tropical and arctic wetland complexes are regional hotspots of CH 4 emissions. However, the scarcity of satellite data over the tropics and northern high latitudes offer limited information for top–down inversions to improve bottom–up estimates. Recent advances in surface measurements of CH 4 fluxes (e.g. FLUXNET-CH 4 ) across a wide range of ecosystems including bogs, fens, marshes, and forest swamps provide an unprecedented opportunity to improve existing bottom–up estimates of wetland CH 4 estimates. We suggest that continuous long-term surface measurements at representative wetlands, high fidelity wetland mapping, combined with an appropriate modeling framework, will be needed to significantly improve global estimates of wetland CH 4 emissions. There is also a pressing unmet need for fine-resolution and high-precision satellite CH 4 observations directed at wetlands.
Authors
- W. J. Riley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4615-2304)
- Daniel J. Jacob (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6373-3100)
- Meghan Halabisky (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1174-2486)
- Kunxiaojia Yuan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1336-5768)
- Benjamin R. K. Runkle (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2583-1199)
- John R. Worden (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0257-9549)
- James D. East (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7199-6229)
- Christian Frankenberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0546-5857)
- Fa Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0625-5587)
- Gavin McNicol (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6655-8045)
- A. Anthony Bloom (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1486-1499)
- Benjamin Poulter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9493-8600)
- Qing Zhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2441-944X)
- Min Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6311-7124)
Institutions
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
- University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
- Stanford University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Environmental Research Letters
- Published
- 2025-01-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adad02
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.42
Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- California Institute of Technology
- Nuclear Safety and Security Commission
- Office of Science
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory
- Biological and Environmental Research
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory