Synthetic biology approaches to negative emissions technologies: a technological and ethical appraisal

This article explores the impact that synthetic biology approaches may have on Negative Emissions Technologies (NETs). Synthetic biology has both altered and created biological pathways inspired by nature to develop new NETs that sequester greenhouse gases into industrially useful chemicals, such as biomass and calcium carbonate. However, synthetic biology continues to encounter difficulties when implementing and scaling up production due to a combination of hard limits (within biology) and ‘soft’ limits (of social and economic costs). Additionally, NETs, along with Ecosystem Technologies in general, operate as climate technofixes, wherein insufficient thought is given to the ethical quandaries arising from releasing designed organisms into the environment, even under controlled conditions. In this paper, we provide a technological and ethical appraisal of synthetic biology approaches to NETs, in the context of climate change mitigation through Ecosystem Technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Climate
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2024.1516823
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synthetic biology approaches to negative emissions technologies: a technological and ethical appraisal

Josh Wodak, Dominic Y. Logel
1 citations
Frontiers in Climate
Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
0.80
article

Synthetic biology approaches to negative emissions technologies: a technological and ethical appraisal

Josh Wodak, Dominic Y. Logel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article explores the impact that synthetic biology approaches may have on Negative Emissions Technologies (NETs). Synthetic biology has both altered and created biological pathways inspired by nature to develop new NETs that sequester greenhouse gases into industrially useful chemicals, such as biomass and calcium carbonate. However, synthetic biology continues to encounter difficulties when implementing and scaling up production due to a combination of hard limits (within biology) and ‘soft’ limits (of social and economic costs). Additionally, NETs, along with Ecosystem Technologies in general, operate as climate technofixes, wherein insufficient thought is given to the ethical quandaries arising from releasing designed organisms into the environment, even under controlled conditions. In this paper, we provide a technological and ethical appraisal of synthetic biology approaches to NETs, in the context of climate change mitigation through Ecosystem Technology.

Frontiers in ClimateVol. 6
Western Sydney University (AU)
Australian Government
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.