Proton arc therapy plan optimization with energy layer pre-selection driven by organ at risk sparing and delivery time

<i>Objective.</i>As proton arc therapy (PAT) approaches clinical implementation, optimizing treatment plans for this innovative delivery modality remains challenging, especially in addressing arc delivery time. Existing algorithms for minimizing delivery time are either optimal but computationally demanding or fast but at the expense of sacrificing many degrees of freedom. In this study, we introduce a flexible method for pre-selecting energy layers (EL) in PAT treatment planning before the actual robust spot weight optimization.<i>Approach.</i>Our EL pre-selection method employs metaheuristics to minimize a bi-objective function, considering a dynamic delivery time proxy and tumor geometrical coverage penalized as a function of selected organs-at-risk crossing. It is capable of parallelizing multiple instances of the problem. We evaluate the method using three different treatment sites, providing a comprehensive dosimetric analysis benchmarked against dynamic proton arc plans generated with early energy layer selection and spot assignment (ELSA) and IMPT plans in RayStation TPS.<i>Result.</i>The algorithm efficiently generates Pareto-optimal EL pre-selections in approximately 5 min. Subsequent PAT treatment plans derived from these selections and optimized within the TPS, demonstrate high-quality target coverage, achieving a high conformity index, and effective sparing of organs at risk. These plans meet clinical goals while achieving a 20%-40% reduction in delivery time compared to ELSA plans.<i>Significance.</i>The proposed algorithm offers speed and efficiency, producing high-quality PAT plans by placing proton arc sectors to efficiently reduce delivery time while maintaining good target coverage and healthy tissues sparing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adad2d
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Radiation Effects in Electronics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proton arc therapy plan optimization with energy layer pre-selection driven by organ at risk sparing and delivery time

Edmond Sterpin, John A. Lee, Macarena Chocan Vera, Dario Di Perri et al.
4 citations
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Radiation Effects in Electronics
2.92
article

Proton arc therapy plan optimization with energy layer pre-selection driven by organ at risk sparing and delivery time

Edmond Sterpin, John A. Lee, Macarena Chocan Vera, Dario Di Perri, Guillaume Janssens, S. Wuyckens, Kevin Souris, Johan Sundström
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>As proton arc therapy (PAT) approaches clinical implementation, optimizing treatment plans for this innovative delivery modality remains challenging, especially in addressing arc delivery time. Existing algorithms for minimizing delivery time are either optimal but computationally demanding or fast but at the expense of sacrificing many degrees of freedom. In this study, we introduce a flexible method for pre-selecting energy layers (EL) in PAT treatment planning before the actual robust spot weight optimization.<i>Approach.</i>Our EL pre-selection method employs metaheuristics to minimize a bi-objective function, considering a dynamic delivery time proxy and tumor geometrical coverage penalized as a function of selected organs-at-risk crossing. It is capable of parallelizing multiple instances of the problem. We evaluate the method using three different treatment sites, providing a comprehensive dosimetric analysis benchmarked against dynamic proton arc plans generated with early energy layer selection and spot assignment (ELSA) and IMPT plans in RayStation TPS.<i>Result.</i>The algorithm efficiently generates Pareto-optimal EL pre-selections in approximately 5 min. Subsequent PAT treatment plans derived from these selections and optimized within the TPS, demonstrate high-quality target coverage, achieving a high conformity index, and effective sparing of organs at risk. These plans meet clinical goals while achieving a 20%-40% reduction in delivery time compared to ELSA plans.<i>Significance.</i>The proposed algorithm offers speed and efficiency, producing high-quality PAT plans by placing proton arc sectors to efficiently reduce delivery time while maintaining good target coverage and healthy tissues sparing.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 70(4)
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE), Ion Beam Applications (Belgium) (BE), Institute of Particle Physics (CA), Cyclotron (Netherlands) (NL), Molecular Oncology (United States) (US), RaySearch Laboratories (Sweden) (SE), UCLouvain (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Waalse Gewest
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Radiation Effects in Electronics
2.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.