IPEM code of practice for proton therapy dosimetry based on the NPL primary standard proton calorimeter calibration service

Internationally, reference dosimetry for clinical proton beams largely follows the guidelines published by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA TRS-398 Rev. 1 (2024). This approach yields a relative standard uncertainty of 1.7% (<i>k</i>= 1) on the absorbed dose to water determined under reference conditions. The new IPEM code of practice presented here, enables the relative standard uncertainty on the absorbed dose to water measured under reference conditions to be reduced to 1.0% (<i>k</i>= 1). This improvement is based on the absorbed dose to water calibration service for proton beams provided by the National Physical Laboratory (NPL), the UK's primary standards laboratory. This significantly reduced uncertainty is achieved through the use of a primary standard level graphite calorimeter to derive absorbed dose to water directly in the clinical department's beam. This eliminates the need for beam quality correction factors (kQ,Q0) as required by the IAEA TRS-398 approach. The portable primary standard level graphite calorimeter, developed over a number of years at the NPL, is sufficiently robust to be useable in the proton beams of clinical facilities both in the UK and overseas. The new code of practice involves performing reference dosimetry measurements directly traceable to the primary standard level graphite calorimeter in a clinical proton beam. Calibration of an ionisation chamber is performed in the centre of a standard test volume (STV) of dose, defined here to be a 10 × 10 × 10 cm volume in water, centred at a depth of 15 cm. Further STVs at reduced and increased depths are also utilised. The designated ionisation chambers are Roos-type plane-parallel chambers. This article provides all the necessary background material, formalism, and specifications of reference conditions required to implement reference dosimetry according to this new code of practice. The Annexes provide a detailed review of ion recombination and how this should be assessed (Annex A1) and detailed work instructions for creating and delivering the STVs (Annex A2).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adad2e
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IPEM code of practice for proton therapy dosimetry based on the NPL primary standard proton calorimeter calibration service

D. D’Souza, Ana P. Lourenço, Frank Van den Heuvel, Ranald I. Mackay et al.
4 citations
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
6.07
article

IPEM code of practice for proton therapy dosimetry based on the NPL primary standard proton calorimeter calibration service

D. D’Souza, Ana P. Lourenço, Frank Van den Heuvel, Ranald I. Mackay, Stuart Green, Hugo Palmans, J. Pettingell, Andrzej Kacperek, Nigel Lee, Russell Thomas, Richard A. Amos, F. Fiorini
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Internationally, reference dosimetry for clinical proton beams largely follows the guidelines published by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA TRS-398 Rev. 1 (2024). This approach yields a relative standard uncertainty of 1.7% (<i>k</i>= 1) on the absorbed dose to water determined under reference conditions. The new IPEM code of practice presented here, enables the relative standard uncertainty on the absorbed dose to water measured under reference conditions to be reduced to 1.0% (<i>k</i>= 1). This improvement is based on the absorbed dose to water calibration service for proton beams provided by the National Physical Laboratory (NPL), the UK's primary standards laboratory. This significantly reduced uncertainty is achieved through the use of a primary standard level graphite calorimeter to derive absorbed dose to water directly in the clinical department's beam. This eliminates the need for beam quality correction factors (kQ,Q0) as required by the IAEA TRS-398 approach. The portable primary standard level graphite calorimeter, developed over a number of years at the NPL, is sufficiently robust to be useable in the proton beams of clinical facilities both in the UK and overseas. The new code of practice involves performing reference dosimetry measurements directly traceable to the primary standard level graphite calorimeter in a clinical proton beam. Calibration of an ionisation chamber is performed in the centre of a standard test volume (STV) of dose, defined here to be a 10 × 10 × 10 cm volume in water, centred at a depth of 15 cm. Further STVs at reduced and increased depths are also utilised. The designated ionisation chambers are Roos-type plane-parallel chambers. This article provides all the necessary background material, formalism, and specifications of reference conditions required to implement reference dosimetry according to this new code of practice. The Annexes provide a detailed review of ion recombination and how this should be assessed (Annex A1) and detailed work instructions for creating and delivering the STVs (Annex A2).

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 70(6)
University College Hospital (GB), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), National Physical Laboratory (GB), Churchill Hospital (GB), University of Surrey (GB), Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Manchester (GB), The Edgbaston Hospital (GB), CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology (GB), Crawley Hospital (GB), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Elekta (United Kingdom) (GB), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Cancer Care Services (US), MedAustron (AT), University College London (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
6.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.