Effective Thermal Conductivity of Nanofluids Containing Silicon Dioxide, Titanium Dioxide, Copper Oxide, Polystyrene, or Polymethylmethacrylate Nanoparticles Dispersed in Water, Ethylene Glycol, or Glycerol

Abstract The present study represents a continuation of our investigations on the effective thermal conductivity λ eff of nanofluids by systematically varying the types of base fluids and particles. For the spherical nanoparticles with mean diameters between (20 and 175) nm, the metal oxides silicon dioxide (SiO 2 ), titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ), and copper oxide (CuO) as well as the polymers polystyrene (PS) and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) were selected to cover a broad range for the particle thermal conductivity λ p from about (0.1 to 30) W⋅m –1 ⋅K –1 . The corresponding polar base fluids water, ethylene glycol, and glycerol allow to not only vary their thermal conductivity λ bf by a factor of more than two, but also their dynamic viscosity by about three orders of magnitude. For the measurement of λ eff of the twelve different particle–fluid combinations, i.e., TiO 2 or CuO with all three liquids as well as SiO 2 , PS, or PMMA with water or ethylene glycol, a steady-state guarded parallel-plate instrument (GPPI) associated with an expanded ( k = 2) relative uncertainty between 0.022 and 0.032 was used at atmospheric pressure over a temperature range from (283 to 358) K at varying particle volume fractions up to 0.31. The results for the thermal-conductivity ratio λ eff · λ bf –1 are independent of temperature and show a moderate and relatively linear change as a function of the particle volume fraction. For similar ratios λ p · λ bf –1 , the experimental data for λ eff · λ bf –1 are also very similar, which are above, close to, or below 1 if λ p is larger than, comparable to, or smaller than λ bf , respectively. For all nanofluids investigated, the Hamilton–Crosser model can describe the present measurement results and reliable experimental data reported in the literature for λ eff · λ bf –1 typically within ± 5 %. Overall, the measurement results from this work contribute to an extension of the database for λ eff of nanofluids with respect to the investigated wide ranges of systems, temperature, and particle volume fraction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Thermophysics
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-024-03488-z
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effective Thermal Conductivity of Nanofluids Containing Silicon Dioxide, Titanium Dioxide, Copper Oxide, Polystyrene, or Polymethylmethacrylate Nanoparticles Dispersed in Water, Ethylene Glycol, or Glycerol

Andreas P. Fröba, Francisco E. Berger Bioucas, Thomas M. Koller
11 citations
International Journal of Thermophysics
Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
7.42
article

Effective Thermal Conductivity of Nanofluids Containing Silicon Dioxide, Titanium Dioxide, Copper Oxide, Polystyrene, or Polymethylmethacrylate Nanoparticles Dispersed in Water, Ethylene Glycol, or Glycerol

Andreas P. Fröba, Francisco E. Berger Bioucas, Thomas M. Koller
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Abstract The present study represents a continuation of our investigations on the effective thermal conductivity λ eff of nanofluids by systematically varying the types of base fluids and particles. For the spherical nanoparticles with mean diameters between (20 and 175) nm, the metal oxides silicon dioxide (SiO 2 ), titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ), and copper oxide (CuO) as well as the polymers polystyrene (PS) and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) were selected to cover a broad range for the particle thermal conductivity λ p from about (0.1 to 30) W⋅m –1 ⋅K –1 . The corresponding polar base fluids water, ethylene glycol, and glycerol allow to not only vary their thermal conductivity λ bf by a factor of more than two, but also their dynamic viscosity by about three orders of magnitude. For the measurement of λ eff of the twelve different particle–fluid combinations, i.e., TiO 2 or CuO with all three liquids as well as SiO 2 , PS, or PMMA with water or ethylene glycol, a steady-state guarded parallel-plate instrument (GPPI) associated with an expanded ( k = 2) relative uncertainty between 0.022 and 0.032 was used at atmospheric pressure over a temperature range from (283 to 358) K at varying particle volume fractions up to 0.31. The results for the thermal-conductivity ratio λ eff · λ bf –1 are independent of temperature and show a moderate and relatively linear change as a function of the particle volume fraction. For similar ratios λ p · λ bf –1 , the experimental data for λ eff · λ bf –1 are also very similar, which are above, close to, or below 1 if λ p is larger than, comparable to, or smaller than λ bf , respectively. For all nanofluids investigated, the Hamilton–Crosser model can describe the present measurement results and reliable experimental data reported in the literature for λ eff · λ bf –1 typically within ± 5 %. Overall, the measurement results from this work contribute to an extension of the database for λ eff of nanofluids with respect to the investigated wide ranges of systems, temperature, and particle volume fraction.

International Journal of ThermophysicsVol. 46(2)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Erlangen Graduate School of Advanced Optical Technologies, Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
7.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.