Affective Evictions:

The article suggests that government statements on anti-ghetto (2021) and security (2020) initiatives feature expressions of ‘white homesickness’ that manifest as longings for a national past and future with less or no migration to Denmark from outside Europe. The analysed statements justify the planned evictions of racialised-migrantised residents of social housing areas. The article argues that the statements also perform ‘affective evictions’ of racialised-migrantised members of society from the community of the imagined national home. Drawing on critical postmigration studies and a media-analytical approach to affect theory, two instrumentalised figures are accentuated as the haunting specters of this homesick politics: the fi gure of insecurity-creating immigrant boys and the figure of parallel societies inhabited by a ‘brown underclass.’ The article concludes that for racialised-migrantised residents of social housing estates in particular, the threat of ‘affective eviction’ paradoxically involves the material threat of eviction from society’s overarching welfare shelter, that is the threat of being deprived of the right to social security.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Kvinder Køn & Forskning
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v37i2.143485
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Homelessness and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Affective Evictions:

Anna Meera Gaonkar
1 citations
Kvinder Køn & Forskning
Homelessness and Social Issues
2.82
article

Affective Evictions:

Anna Meera Gaonkar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article suggests that government statements on anti-ghetto (2021) and security (2020) initiatives feature expressions of ‘white homesickness’ that manifest as longings for a national past and future with less or no migration to Denmark from outside Europe. The analysed statements justify the planned evictions of racialised-migrantised residents of social housing areas. The article argues that the statements also perform ‘affective evictions’ of racialised-migrantised members of society from the community of the imagined national home. Drawing on critical postmigration studies and a media-analytical approach to affect theory, two instrumentalised figures are accentuated as the haunting specters of this homesick politics: the fi gure of insecurity-creating immigrant boys and the figure of parallel societies inhabited by a ‘brown underclass.’ The article concludes that for racialised-migrantised residents of social housing estates in particular, the threat of ‘affective eviction’ paradoxically involves the material threat of eviction from society’s overarching welfare shelter, that is the threat of being deprived of the right to social security.

Kvinder Køn & ForskningVol. 37(2)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Homelessness and Social Issues
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.