Development of the estimation models for annual soil temperature according to soil depth

This study focus on development of the estimation models for yearly bare soil temperature (Ts) according to soil depth (z) and examined the difference between them [dT(z1-z2)=Ts(z1)-Ts(z2)] using data collected from 23th May 2023 to 23th May 2024 in Sandy Loam. Principle results are as follows: (1) The deeper of the soil depth, the higher of the annual maximum, average and mininum soil temperature, where as the smaller of the annual range. (2) The deeper of the soil depth, the smaller of standard deviation of the annual soil temperature. (3) The differential of soil temperature to soil depth (dT/dz) for annual maximum, average and minimum soil temperature was 0.015°C, 0.049°C and 0.110°C/cm, respectively. (4) The cation process of the models were based on the error analysis criteria with the view point of accuracy, precision and association. (5) The estimation models for Ts at the depth according to Julian date were developed as a sine functions (MTs10: model for 10 cm, MTs20: model for 20 cm, MTs30: model for 30 cm) all judged 『Fit well』. (6) The estimation models for dT between the Ts of the soil depth according to Julian date were developed as a sine functions [(MdTs(10-20): model for 10-20 cm, MdTs(20-30): model for 20-30 cm, MdTs(10-30): model for 10-30 cm)] all judged 『Fit』. In summary, this study successfully developed estimation models for Ts and dT, employing sine function regression approaches. The models were rigorously evaluated for the change of soil temperature using error analysis criteria, providing valuable insights into annual soil temperature dynamics according to soil depth in Sandy Loam.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Climate Change Research
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15531/ksccr.2024.15.6.1195
Primary Topic
Climate change and permafrost
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the estimation models for annual soil temperature according to soil depth

Ki Cheol Eom
Journal of Climate Change Research
Climate change and permafrost
article

Development of the estimation models for annual soil temperature according to soil depth

Ki Cheol Eom
article en

Abstract

This study focus on development of the estimation models for yearly bare soil temperature (Ts) according to soil depth (z) and examined the difference between them [dT(z1-z2)=Ts(z1)-Ts(z2)] using data collected from 23th May 2023 to 23th May 2024 in Sandy Loam. Principle results are as follows: (1) The deeper of the soil depth, the higher of the annual maximum, average and mininum soil temperature, where as the smaller of the annual range. (2) The deeper of the soil depth, the smaller of standard deviation of the annual soil temperature. (3) The differential of soil temperature to soil depth (dT/dz) for annual maximum, average and minimum soil temperature was 0.015°C, 0.049°C and 0.110°C/cm, respectively. (4) The cation process of the models were based on the error analysis criteria with the view point of accuracy, precision and association. (5) The estimation models for Ts at the depth according to Julian date were developed as a sine functions (MTs10: model for 10 cm, MTs20: model for 20 cm, MTs30: model for 30 cm) all judged 『Fit well』. (6) The estimation models for dT between the Ts of the soil depth according to Julian date were developed as a sine functions [(MdTs(10-20): model for 10-20 cm, MdTs(20-30): model for 20-30 cm, MdTs(10-30): model for 10-30 cm)] all judged 『Fit』. In summary, this study successfully developed estimation models for Ts and dT, employing sine function regression approaches. The models were rigorously evaluated for the change of soil temperature using error analysis criteria, providing valuable insights into annual soil temperature dynamics according to soil depth in Sandy Loam.

Journal of Climate Change ResearchVol. 15(6)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Climate change and permafrost
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.