Laboratory model test of contact erosion in railway substructure

The underestimated risk of contact erosion failure in railway substructures poses a significant threat to railway safety, particularly at the interface between the ballast/subballast and subgrade. The larger constriction size at this interface exacerbates the potential for long-term erosion, necessitating attention to safeguard railway integrity. This study introduces a novel laboratory erosion testing apparatus to evaluate contact erosion at the subballast-subgrade interface under cyclic loading. Subgrade soils with varying fines contents are tested, and the effect of pressure head on erosion is investigated in detail. The results indicate that sandy soil with higher internal stability exhibits a higher critical pressure head for contact erosion. Cyclic loading induces oscillations in pore water pressure within the subballast layer, with higher pressure heads leading to larger amplitudes. Excess pore water pressure is generated in the sandy soil layer during cyclic loading and gradually dissipates over time. Fine eroded particles migrate into the subballast layer, forming mud, while coarse eroded particles accumulate at the base, creating low-permeability interlayers. Notably, the geometric conditions alone may not guarantee effective prevention of contact erosion in railway substructures. The hydraulic conditions for contact erosion are more easily achieved under cyclic loading compared to static loading. These distinctive features of contact erosion in railway substructures, different from those observed in hydraulic structures, provide some insights for the development of remediation strategies and improvements in railway substructure design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Geotechnics
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2025.101499
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laboratory model test of contact erosion in railway substructure

Weide Zhong, Xuzhen He, Sheng Zhang, Yewei Zheng et al.
2 citations
Transportation Geotechnics
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
1.91
article

Laboratory model test of contact erosion in railway substructure

Weide Zhong, Xuzhen He, Sheng Zhang, Yewei Zheng, Feng Gao, Shaoheng Dai
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The underestimated risk of contact erosion failure in railway substructures poses a significant threat to railway safety, particularly at the interface between the ballast/subballast and subgrade. The larger constriction size at this interface exacerbates the potential for long-term erosion, necessitating attention to safeguard railway integrity. This study introduces a novel laboratory erosion testing apparatus to evaluate contact erosion at the subballast-subgrade interface under cyclic loading. Subgrade soils with varying fines contents are tested, and the effect of pressure head on erosion is investigated in detail. The results indicate that sandy soil with higher internal stability exhibits a higher critical pressure head for contact erosion. Cyclic loading induces oscillations in pore water pressure within the subballast layer, with higher pressure heads leading to larger amplitudes. Excess pore water pressure is generated in the sandy soil layer during cyclic loading and gradually dissipates over time. Fine eroded particles migrate into the subballast layer, forming mud, while coarse eroded particles accumulate at the base, creating low-permeability interlayers. Notably, the geometric conditions alone may not guarantee effective prevention of contact erosion in railway substructures. The hydraulic conditions for contact erosion are more easily achieved under cyclic loading compared to static loading. These distinctive features of contact erosion in railway substructures, different from those observed in hydraulic structures, provide some insights for the development of remediation strategies and improvements in railway substructure design.

Transportation GeotechnicsVol. 51
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Qinghai University (CN), Central South University (CN), Wuhan University (CN), Qinghai New Energy (China) (CN), Changsha University of Science and Technology (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.