Evaluating the performance of snow depth reanalysis products in the arid region of Central Asia

Central Asia (CA) faces water scarcity issues and heavily relies on snowmelt; however, the limited number of monitoring stations cannot meet snow monitoring needs. Reanalysis data could fill this gap, but their accuracy in CA remains uncertain. This study evaluates snow depth (SD) products from ERA5, ERA5-Land, JRA-55, MERRA-2, and GLDAS in CA using in situ data and the three-cornered hat (TCH) method. In situ data evaluations indicate that JRA-55 outperforms the other SD products overall. However, each of the other four SD products demonstrates unique strengths under different conditions. The TCH method indicates that the ERA5, JRA-55, MERRA-2 and GLDAS SD products have low uncertainty, with regions of uncertainty less than 1.0 cm covering more than 70% of CA, whereas ERA5-Land displays relatively high uncertainty. Both in situ data and TCH indicate poor performance for all five SD products in Tajikistan and in high-altitude areas. Errors in the five SD reanalysis datasets in certain regions may stem from inaccuracies in precipitation and air temperature forcing data. The use of a multidataset ensemble average SD product significantly enhances the ability to capture SDs in CA. Our study provides reliable data support for SD monitoring in the CA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Digital Earth
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2024.2447368
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the performance of snow depth reanalysis products in the arid region of Central Asia

Guli·Jiapaer, Liancheng Zhang, Philippe De Maeyer, Tim Van de Voorde et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Digital Earth
Cryospheric studies and observations
2.60
article

Evaluating the performance of snow depth reanalysis products in the arid region of Central Asia

Guli·Jiapaer, Liancheng Zhang, Philippe De Maeyer, Tim Van de Voorde, Kaixiong Lin, Hongwu Liang, Tongwei Ju, Tao Yu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Central Asia (CA) faces water scarcity issues and heavily relies on snowmelt; however, the limited number of monitoring stations cannot meet snow monitoring needs. Reanalysis data could fill this gap, but their accuracy in CA remains uncertain. This study evaluates snow depth (SD) products from ERA5, ERA5-Land, JRA-55, MERRA-2, and GLDAS in CA using in situ data and the three-cornered hat (TCH) method. In situ data evaluations indicate that JRA-55 outperforms the other SD products overall. However, each of the other four SD products demonstrates unique strengths under different conditions. The TCH method indicates that the ERA5, JRA-55, MERRA-2 and GLDAS SD products have low uncertainty, with regions of uncertainty less than 1.0 cm covering more than 70% of CA, whereas ERA5-Land displays relatively high uncertainty. Both in situ data and TCH indicate poor performance for all five SD products in Tajikistan and in high-altitude areas. Errors in the five SD reanalysis datasets in certain regions may stem from inaccuracies in precipitation and air temperature forcing data. The use of a multidataset ensemble average SD product significantly enhances the ability to capture SDs in CA. Our study provides reliable data support for SD monitoring in the CA.

International Journal of Digital EarthVol. 18(1)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Ghent University (BE), Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography (CN), Joint Research Center (BE), Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Education Department (CN), GeoInformation (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Third Framework Programme, Special Fund Project for Science and Technology Innovation Strategy of Guangdong Province, Guangxi Innovation-Driven Development Project
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cryospheric studies and observations
2.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.