A Study on Differences in Production Egg Quality, and Welfare Indicators of Hens in Welfare Rearing Facilities during the Early Laying Period

This study was conducted to compare the differences in productivity, egg quality, serum biochemistry, and animal welfare levels of laying hens in different housing systems [Density enhanced conventional battery cage (DCC) and furnished cage (FC)] during the early laying period (25—34 weeks). A total of 300 Hy-Line Brown laying hens at 25 weeks of age (average body weight 1,774±20.59 g) were used. Two housing environments were set up with 2 treatments and 5 replicates each, and 150 hens were randomly assigned to each environment, with a total feeding trial period of 10 weeks. At 34 weeks of age, body weight was significantly lower in the DCC group (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05), but the laying rate and egg production were significantly higher in the DCC group (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). In terms of egg quality, there were no significant differences between the groups in eggshell strength, Haugh unit, eggshell thickness, and yolk color. Serum biochemical results showed that the FC group had higher levels of ALT, TP, ALB, Ca, IP, and lower GLU levels. Serum CORT levels were higher in the FC group (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). Feather damage results showed higher damage in the neck and head in the DCC group (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05), but higher damage in the back, chest, tail, and overall average in the FC group (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). Therefore, it is concluded that productivity and animal welfare indicators decreased in the FC group. Further research on furnished cages is needed to improve animal welfare.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Poultry Science
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2024.51.4.187
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on Differences in Production Egg Quality, and Welfare Indicators of Hens in Welfare Rearing Facilities during the Early Laying Period

Hwan-Ku Kang, Woo‐Do Lee, Jihye Lee, Jiseon Son et al.
Korean Journal of Poultry Science
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

A Study on Differences in Production Egg Quality, and Welfare Indicators of Hens in Welfare Rearing Facilities during the Early Laying Period

Hwan-Ku Kang, Woo‐Do Lee, Jihye Lee, Jiseon Son, Eui-Chul Hong, Hyun‐Soo Kim, Hee‐Jin Kim, Sung June Byun
article en

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare the differences in productivity, egg quality, serum biochemistry, and animal welfare levels of laying hens in different housing systems [Density enhanced conventional battery cage (DCC) and furnished cage (FC)] during the early laying period (25—34 weeks). A total of 300 Hy-Line Brown laying hens at 25 weeks of age (average body weight 1,774±20.59 g) were used. Two housing environments were set up with 2 treatments and 5 replicates each, and 150 hens were randomly assigned to each environment, with a total feeding trial period of 10 weeks. At 34 weeks of age, body weight was significantly lower in the DCC group (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05), but the laying rate and egg production were significantly higher in the DCC group (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). In terms of egg quality, there were no significant differences between the groups in eggshell strength, Haugh unit, eggshell thickness, and yolk color. Serum biochemical results showed that the FC group had higher levels of ALT, TP, ALB, Ca, IP, and lower GLU levels. Serum CORT levels were higher in the FC group (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). Feather damage results showed higher damage in the neck and head in the DCC group (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05), but higher damage in the back, chest, tail, and overall average in the FC group (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). Therefore, it is concluded that productivity and animal welfare indicators decreased in the FC group. Further research on furnished cages is needed to improve animal welfare.

Korean Journal of Poultry ScienceVol. 51(4)
Rural Development Administration
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.