Comparison of Broiler Meat Quality from Conventional and Animal Welfare Farm in Korean Market: Focusing on Breast and Thigh Meat

As chicken consumption has increased, concerns about conventional farm have grown, which in turn has heightened interest in animal welfare. However, research on the quality characteristic of broiler from animal welfare farm remains limited yet. In this study, we aimed to compare the meat quality characteristic of chicken from conventional and animal welfare farm in Korean market. There was a total of 2 treatment groups: broilers from conventional farm (BCF), broilers from animal welfare farm (BAW), consisting of chicken breast and thigh meat. For the comparison of chicken meat quality, proximate composition (moisture, crude protein, crude fat, crude ash), pH, water holding capacity (WHC), cooking loss (CL), thawing loss (TL) and color were analyzed, and sensory evaluation was conducted. The pH values of breast and thigh meat of BAW were significantly lower than BCF. The WHC of breast and thigh meat of BAW was significantly higher than BCF. The CL of breast and thigh meat of BAW was lower than BCF but there was no statistical difference. The TL of breast meat of BAW was significantly lower than BCF. For color, no statistical difference was observed in the brightness of breast meat, though redness and yellowness were higher in BCF. The brightness of thigh meat was significantly higher in BAW, with no statistical differences in redness and yellowness. Sensory evaluation showed no statistical differences in both breast and thigh meat between BCF and BAW.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Poultry Science
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2024.51.4.221
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Broiler Meat Quality from Conventional and Animal Welfare Farm in Korean Market: Focusing on Breast and Thigh Meat

So Young Jang, Gyutae Park, Jae-Jun Kang, Sol-Hee Lee et al.
Korean Journal of Poultry Science
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

Comparison of Broiler Meat Quality from Conventional and Animal Welfare Farm in Korean Market: Focusing on Breast and Thigh Meat

So Young Jang, Gyutae Park, Jae-Jun Kang, Sol-Hee Lee, Youngho Lim, Jungseok Choi, Min Jun Kim, Sang Hun Park, Beob Mo Ku
article en

Abstract

As chicken consumption has increased, concerns about conventional farm have grown, which in turn has heightened interest in animal welfare. However, research on the quality characteristic of broiler from animal welfare farm remains limited yet. In this study, we aimed to compare the meat quality characteristic of chicken from conventional and animal welfare farm in Korean market. There was a total of 2 treatment groups: broilers from conventional farm (BCF), broilers from animal welfare farm (BAW), consisting of chicken breast and thigh meat. For the comparison of chicken meat quality, proximate composition (moisture, crude protein, crude fat, crude ash), pH, water holding capacity (WHC), cooking loss (CL), thawing loss (TL) and color were analyzed, and sensory evaluation was conducted. The pH values of breast and thigh meat of BAW were significantly lower than BCF. The WHC of breast and thigh meat of BAW was significantly higher than BCF. The CL of breast and thigh meat of BAW was lower than BCF but there was no statistical difference. The TL of breast meat of BAW was significantly lower than BCF. For color, no statistical difference was observed in the brightness of breast meat, though redness and yellowness were higher in BCF. The brightness of thigh meat was significantly higher in BAW, with no statistical differences in redness and yellowness. Sensory evaluation showed no statistical differences in both breast and thigh meat between BCF and BAW.

Korean Journal of Poultry ScienceVol. 51(4)
National Research Foundation of Korea
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.