‘United as Free and Equal’: The New Commonwealth, Prime Ministers’ Meetings, and the Korean War

The New Commonwealth emerged from the first wave of decolonisation in South Asia in the late 1940s. The seminal moment occurred with the signing of the 1949 London Declaration that allowed republican India to remain a Commonwealth member. However, India, Pakistan and Ceylon were divided at the first two Prime Ministers’ Meeting after independence and made no attempt to unite in opposition to the Old ‘white’ Commonwealth members. This article will thus demonstrate that the three Prime Ministers’ Meetings that took place during the Korean War marked a watershed for the New Commonwealth. In 1951 with the Korean War close to escalating into a global conflict, Jawaharlal Nehru, Liaquat Ali Khan and D. S. Senanayake worked in unison to forge a Commonwealth policy to end the fighting before Washington pressed the UN to brand China an aggressor and used its atomic arsenal. This effort met resistance from the Old Commonwealth countries but at least partially achieved its goal. The 1951 Prime Ministers’ Meeting, therefore, set the precedent for united New Commonwealth action at future Prime Ministers’ Meetings. Nevertheless, at the 1952 and 1953 Prime Ministers’ Meetings conditions were not right for further New Commonwealth attempts to influence Commonwealth policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International History Review
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2025.2455194
Primary Topic
Japanese History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘United as Free and Equal’: The New Commonwealth, Prime Ministers’ Meetings, and the Korean War

R. H. Barnes
The International History Review
Japanese History and Culture
article

‘United as Free and Equal’: The New Commonwealth, Prime Ministers’ Meetings, and the Korean War

R. H. Barnes
article en

Abstract

The New Commonwealth emerged from the first wave of decolonisation in South Asia in the late 1940s. The seminal moment occurred with the signing of the 1949 London Declaration that allowed republican India to remain a Commonwealth member. However, India, Pakistan and Ceylon were divided at the first two Prime Ministers’ Meeting after independence and made no attempt to unite in opposition to the Old ‘white’ Commonwealth members. This article will thus demonstrate that the three Prime Ministers’ Meetings that took place during the Korean War marked a watershed for the New Commonwealth. In 1951 with the Korean War close to escalating into a global conflict, Jawaharlal Nehru, Liaquat Ali Khan and D. S. Senanayake worked in unison to forge a Commonwealth policy to end the fighting before Washington pressed the UN to brand China an aggressor and used its atomic arsenal. This effort met resistance from the Old Commonwealth countries but at least partially achieved its goal. The 1951 Prime Ministers’ Meeting, therefore, set the precedent for united New Commonwealth action at future Prime Ministers’ Meetings. Nevertheless, at the 1952 and 1953 Prime Ministers’ Meetings conditions were not right for further New Commonwealth attempts to influence Commonwealth policy.

The International History ReviewVol. 47(4)
York St John University (GB)
York St John University
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Japanese History and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘United as Free and Equal’: The New Commonwealth, Prime Ministers’ Meetings, and the Korean War — R. H. Barnes · The International History Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS