The environment–economic growth trade-off: does support for environmental protection depend on its economic consequences?

Belief in a trade-off between economic growth and environmental protection is an important feature of the politics of environmental policy. Yet the prevalence and consequences – for policy positions – of this belief are only indirectly examined in dominant treatments of public attitudes. We investigate belief in the existence of the trade-off directly. Those who believe more strongly in the trade-off express more moderate policy views. However, increasing belief in the existence of the trade-off via experimental manipulation yields null effects on policy positions. Appealing to the trade-off to justify prioritising growth may not provide a logical defense in the eyes of the public.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Economics
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108522
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The environment–economic growth trade-off: does support for environmental protection depend on its economic consequences?

Lucy Barnes, Andrew McNeil
2 citations
Ecological Economics
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
6.26
article

The environment–economic growth trade-off: does support for environmental protection depend on its economic consequences?

Lucy Barnes, Andrew McNeil
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Belief in a trade-off between economic growth and environmental protection is an important feature of the politics of environmental policy. Yet the prevalence and consequences – for policy positions – of this belief are only indirectly examined in dominant treatments of public attitudes. We investigate belief in the existence of the trade-off directly. Those who believe more strongly in the trade-off express more moderate policy views. However, increasing belief in the existence of the trade-off via experimental manipulation yields null effects on policy positions. Appealing to the trade-off to justify prioritising growth may not provide a logical defense in the eyes of the public.

Ecological EconomicsVol. 230
The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University College London (GB)
UK Research and Innovation
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.