The fate of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) during pyrolysis and co-pyrolysis of biosolids with alum sludge and wheat straw

The literature suggests that the pyrolysis of biosolids merely volatilizes per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) into gas or liquid phase, requiring a thermal oxidizer operating at 900–1200 ºC with more than 2 second residence time, to destroy the volatilized PFAS. This study investigates the potential and extent of destruction of PFAS under pyrolysis environment. Pyrolysis and co-pyrolysis experiments were conducted in a bench-scale horizontal fixed-bed reactor. Co-pyrolysis experiments was carried out by blending biosolids with alum sludge or wheat straw at a 1:1 (w/w) mixing ratio at 600 °C. Gas and solids residence times in the reactor were approximately 10 seconds and 1 hour, respectively. The study also explored the effects of lime and biochar as catalysts on PFAS destruction. Results showed near complete removal of PFAS from biochar with the total PFAS concentration reducing from 409.9 ng/g in biosolids to 0.31 ng/g in biochar, suggesting significant volatilization or decomposition at 600 °C. However, PFAS concentrations in volatile products were also significantly low (5.5 ng/g in bio-oil and 0.15 ng/g in scrubber water), indicating 99.4 % PFAS destruction efficiency. The co-pyrolysis of biosolids further improved PFAS removal, likely due to dilutive and synergistic effects. However, catalysis with lime and biochar did not have a significant effect on the PFAS destruction efficiency. This research highlights the potential for near complete PFAS destruction in pyrolysis and co-pyrolysis under the current experimental conditions but emphasizes the need for further investigations under the operational parameters of large-scale pyrolysis plants. • Biosolids pyrolysis at 600 ℃ achieved > 99 % PFAS destruction under sufficient residence time. • Co-pyrolysis with alum sludge and wheat straw increased PFAS destruction compared to sole pyrolysis. • Residual PFAS concentration in biochar met proposed regulations for unrestricted land applications. • Lime and biochar catalysts had minimal effect on PFAS destruction during biosolids pyrolysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2025.106970
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The fate of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) during pyrolysis and co-pyrolysis of biosolids with alum sludge and wheat straw

Mallavarapu Megharaj, Sudhakar Pabba, Rajender Gupta, Kalpit Shah et al.
6 citations
Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
5.16
article

The fate of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) during pyrolysis and co-pyrolysis of biosolids with alum sludge and wheat straw

Mallavarapu Megharaj, Sudhakar Pabba, Rajender Gupta, Kalpit Shah, Anithadevi Kenday Sivaram, Ibrahim Gbolahan Hakeem, Savankumar Patel, Abhishek Sharma, Aravind Surapaneni, Jorge Paz‐Ferreiro, Nimesha Rathnayake
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The literature suggests that the pyrolysis of biosolids merely volatilizes per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) into gas or liquid phase, requiring a thermal oxidizer operating at 900–1200 ºC with more than 2 second residence time, to destroy the volatilized PFAS. This study investigates the potential and extent of destruction of PFAS under pyrolysis environment. Pyrolysis and co-pyrolysis experiments were conducted in a bench-scale horizontal fixed-bed reactor. Co-pyrolysis experiments was carried out by blending biosolids with alum sludge or wheat straw at a 1:1 (w/w) mixing ratio at 600 °C. Gas and solids residence times in the reactor were approximately 10 seconds and 1 hour, respectively. The study also explored the effects of lime and biochar as catalysts on PFAS destruction. Results showed near complete removal of PFAS from biochar with the total PFAS concentration reducing from 409.9 ng/g in biosolids to 0.31 ng/g in biochar, suggesting significant volatilization or decomposition at 600 °C. However, PFAS concentrations in volatile products were also significantly low (5.5 ng/g in bio-oil and 0.15 ng/g in scrubber water), indicating 99.4 % PFAS destruction efficiency. The co-pyrolysis of biosolids further improved PFAS removal, likely due to dilutive and synergistic effects. However, catalysis with lime and biochar did not have a significant effect on the PFAS destruction efficiency. This research highlights the potential for near complete PFAS destruction in pyrolysis and co-pyrolysis under the current experimental conditions but emphasizes the need for further investigations under the operational parameters of large-scale pyrolysis plants. • Biosolids pyrolysis at 600 ℃ achieved > 99 % PFAS destruction under sufficient residence time. • Co-pyrolysis with alum sludge and wheat straw increased PFAS destruction compared to sole pyrolysis. • Residual PFAS concentration in biochar met proposed regulations for unrestricted land applications. • Lime and biochar catalysts had minimal effect on PFAS destruction during biosolids pyrolysis.

Journal of Analytical and Applied PyrolysisVol. 187
University of Alberta (CA), South East Water (Australia) (AU), Manipal University Jaipur, University of Newcastle Australia (AU), RMIT University (AU), University of Rajasthan (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
5.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.