Analysis of a large fire in an apartment building used for social housing in Norway

• Multidisciplinary fire investigation of a municipal building for people at risk. • Wooden balcony façades contributed to the large fire. • Occupant were awake during the night and therefore evacuated. • Close-knit relationship network made occupants evacuate each other. • Different circumstances would have given multiple fatalities. At 2 a.m. August 7th 2021, the emergency response centre of the city of Bergen, Norway, received a call from a private citizen reporting large flames appearing from a 4 floor 24 apartment municipal building housing people with drug addiction. Upon arrival 11 min later, the first responders faced a fire that had already spread and involved the whole building. To their surprise, all residents were already accounted for outside the building. The present study analyses why the fire developed that fast, why the automatic fire alarm system did not warn the emergency response centre early and how all occupants were accounted for in such a dramatic fire scenario. It turns out that the fire most likely started in one of the all-wooden floor balconies at ground level. The originally planned 1.2 m tall balcony glazing facing a public road had been substituted by wood to ensure privacy and prevent visibility. The balcony subdivision walls had 20 cm gaps at ceiling level. Analysis confirmed that this balcony construction, i.e., all-wooden and with gaps at the top of the division wall, contributed significantly both during the early fire development as well as to the very fast vertical and horizontal fire spread over the entire building façade. Post-fire interviews revealed that a significant number of occupants were awake this night, allowing them to promptly detect the fire in the building. A close-knit relationship network, including both friends and acquaintances, was of major importance regarding door-to-door alarming unaware residents about the immediate danger. From the investigations conducted after the fire it is quite clear that under different circumstances this fire could have resulted in multiple fatalities. Though the incident may be considered a success regarding the “no loss of lives” focus in Norwegian fire safety regulations, the study revealed weaknesses in balcony construction and use of materials as well as lack of exterior automatic fire detection and mitigation of external fires. The study revealed important learning points for future prevention of possibly far worse fire incidents, as well as the importance of a close-knit relationship network in a crisis situation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Safety Science
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106782
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fire dynamics and safety research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of a large fire in an apartment building used for social housing in Norway

Asbjørn Lein Aalberg, Bjarne Christian Hagen, Anne Steen‐Hansen, Torgrim Log et al.
2 citations
Safety Science
Fire dynamics and safety research
2.61
article

Analysis of a large fire in an apartment building used for social housing in Norway

Asbjørn Lein Aalberg, Bjarne Christian Hagen, Anne Steen‐Hansen, Torgrim Log, Edvard Aamodt, Vegard Ervik Olsen, Caroline Kristiansen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Multidisciplinary fire investigation of a municipal building for people at risk. • Wooden balcony façades contributed to the large fire. • Occupant were awake during the night and therefore evacuated. • Close-knit relationship network made occupants evacuate each other. • Different circumstances would have given multiple fatalities. At 2 a.m. August 7th 2021, the emergency response centre of the city of Bergen, Norway, received a call from a private citizen reporting large flames appearing from a 4 floor 24 apartment municipal building housing people with drug addiction. Upon arrival 11 min later, the first responders faced a fire that had already spread and involved the whole building. To their surprise, all residents were already accounted for outside the building. The present study analyses why the fire developed that fast, why the automatic fire alarm system did not warn the emergency response centre early and how all occupants were accounted for in such a dramatic fire scenario. It turns out that the fire most likely started in one of the all-wooden floor balconies at ground level. The originally planned 1.2 m tall balcony glazing facing a public road had been substituted by wood to ensure privacy and prevent visibility. The balcony subdivision walls had 20 cm gaps at ceiling level. Analysis confirmed that this balcony construction, i.e., all-wooden and with gaps at the top of the division wall, contributed significantly both during the early fire development as well as to the very fast vertical and horizontal fire spread over the entire building façade. Post-fire interviews revealed that a significant number of occupants were awake this night, allowing them to promptly detect the fire in the building. A close-knit relationship network, including both friends and acquaintances, was of major importance regarding door-to-door alarming unaware residents about the immediate danger. From the investigations conducted after the fire it is quite clear that under different circumstances this fire could have resulted in multiple fatalities. Though the incident may be considered a success regarding the “no loss of lives” focus in Norwegian fire safety regulations, the study revealed weaknesses in balcony construction and use of materials as well as lack of exterior automatic fire detection and mitigation of external fires. The study revealed important learning points for future prevention of possibly far worse fire incidents, as well as the importance of a close-knit relationship network in a crisis situation.

Safety ScienceVol. 185
SINTEF (NO), Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Multiconsult (Norway) (NO), Gassco (Norway) (NO), Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO), SINTEF Digital
Norges Forskningsråd
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Fire dynamics and safety research
2.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.