Comparison and Analysis of the Introduction Section on Division in Korean and Japanese Elementary School Textbooks

This study aims to compare and analyze the structure and instructional approaches of division introduction units in elementary school mathematics textbooks of Korea and Japan. For this purpose, two Korean textbooks based on the 2015 revised curriculum and one Japanese textbook were analyzed, focusing on unit structure, methods for introducing division and division expression, the relationship between multiplication and division, and division quotient calculation methods. The analysis revealed that Korean textbooks structurally connect partitive and measurement division, enabling students to understand the relationship between multiplication and division and to learn quotient calculation through multiplication tables of the divisor. Korean textbooks emphasize a quotient calculation method using multiplication expressions limited to the measurement context, where the quotient serves as the multiplier and the divisor as the multiplicand. In contrast, Japanese textbooks guide students to intuitively distinguish partitive and measurement division through contextual situations represented with models and language. Quotient calculation is taught by using the multiplication tables of the divisor, incorporating multiplication expressions in both contexts to link division expressions and quotients. While Korea’s approach emphasizes abstract and formal mathematical knowledge, Japan’s approach focuses on maintaining the coordination of the two division contexts and guiding students to understand the relationship between multiplication and division. Based on these findings, this study presents suggestions for teaching the division introduction unit in elementary schools.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57090/sm.2024.12.26.4.597
Primary Topic
Educational Systems and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison and Analysis of the Introduction Section on Division in Korean and Japanese Elementary School Textbooks

Eunah Choi, YounJoon Joung
Educational Systems and Policies
article

Comparison and Analysis of the Introduction Section on Division in Korean and Japanese Elementary School Textbooks

Eunah Choi, YounJoon Joung
article en

Abstract

This study aims to compare and analyze the structure and instructional approaches of division introduction units in elementary school mathematics textbooks of Korea and Japan. For this purpose, two Korean textbooks based on the 2015 revised curriculum and one Japanese textbook were analyzed, focusing on unit structure, methods for introducing division and division expression, the relationship between multiplication and division, and division quotient calculation methods. The analysis revealed that Korean textbooks structurally connect partitive and measurement division, enabling students to understand the relationship between multiplication and division and to learn quotient calculation through multiplication tables of the divisor. Korean textbooks emphasize a quotient calculation method using multiplication expressions limited to the measurement context, where the quotient serves as the multiplier and the divisor as the multiplicand. In contrast, Japanese textbooks guide students to intuitively distinguish partitive and measurement division through contextual situations represented with models and language. Quotient calculation is taught by using the multiplication tables of the divisor, incorporating multiplication expressions in both contexts to link division expressions and quotients. While Korea’s approach emphasizes abstract and formal mathematical knowledge, Japan’s approach focuses on maintaining the coordination of the two division contexts and guiding students to understand the relationship between multiplication and division. Based on these findings, this study presents suggestions for teaching the division introduction unit in elementary schools.

Vol. 26(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Educational Systems and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.