Enforcing the Law Against Animal Cruelty Perpetrators: The Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Health Act

Violence extends beyond humans, with a troubling increase in cases of animal cruelty. Such abuse is not only an affront to ethical standards but also a direct violation of the law, as the maltreatment of animals is expressly prohibited under Indonesia’s legal provisions. The study aims to critically assess and analyze the enforcement of legal measures against animal cruelty perpetrators in accordance with Law No. 41 of 2014 on Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Health. The study employs a juridical-empirical approach, utilizing a descriptive-analytical research design. It integrates both doctrinal and field research, drawing on primary and secondary data. The analysis is based on qualitative juridical reasoning, with data systematically examined through a comprehensive and critical qualitative evaluation. The research reveals that individuals responsible for animal cruelty can be held accountable under Article 302 of the Indonesian Penal Code, Article 66A of Law No. 41 of 2014 on Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Health, and Government Regulation No. 95 of 2012 on Veterinary Health and Animal Welfare. However, the enforcement of these legal provisions remains suboptimal. It is primarily due to insufficient public awareness of animal welfare, resulting in underreporting of abuse cases, which in turn impedes the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies in addressing the issue. The conclusion reveals that the insufficient public awareness and legal consciousness regarding Law No. 41 of 2014 on Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Health, alongside the prohibition of animal cruelty, has allowed instances of abuse to occur without being reported or addressed, thereby exposing the inadequacy of current law enforcement. It is imperative to reconsider and strengthen the legal framework by imposing more severe criminal penalties on animal cruelty offenders. Moreover, establishing a specialized task force for animal welfare could provide a strategic breakthrough in combating these violations effectively

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNIFIKASI Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25134/unifikasi.v11i02.774
Primary Topic
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enforcing the Law Against Animal Cruelty Perpetrators: The Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Health Act

Sarip Hidayat, Suwari Akhmaddhian, Haris Budiman, Dewi Setiawati
UNIFIKASI Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
article

Enforcing the Law Against Animal Cruelty Perpetrators: The Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Health Act

Sarip Hidayat, Suwari Akhmaddhian, Haris Budiman, Dewi Setiawati
article en

Abstract

Violence extends beyond humans, with a troubling increase in cases of animal cruelty. Such abuse is not only an affront to ethical standards but also a direct violation of the law, as the maltreatment of animals is expressly prohibited under Indonesia’s legal provisions. The study aims to critically assess and analyze the enforcement of legal measures against animal cruelty perpetrators in accordance with Law No. 41 of 2014 on Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Health. The study employs a juridical-empirical approach, utilizing a descriptive-analytical research design. It integrates both doctrinal and field research, drawing on primary and secondary data. The analysis is based on qualitative juridical reasoning, with data systematically examined through a comprehensive and critical qualitative evaluation. The research reveals that individuals responsible for animal cruelty can be held accountable under Article 302 of the Indonesian Penal Code, Article 66A of Law No. 41 of 2014 on Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Health, and Government Regulation No. 95 of 2012 on Veterinary Health and Animal Welfare. However, the enforcement of these legal provisions remains suboptimal. It is primarily due to insufficient public awareness of animal welfare, resulting in underreporting of abuse cases, which in turn impedes the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies in addressing the issue. The conclusion reveals that the insufficient public awareness and legal consciousness regarding Law No. 41 of 2014 on Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Health, alongside the prohibition of animal cruelty, has allowed instances of abuse to occur without being reported or addressed, thereby exposing the inadequacy of current law enforcement. It is imperative to reconsider and strengthen the legal framework by imposing more severe criminal penalties on animal cruelty offenders. Moreover, establishing a specialized task force for animal welfare could provide a strategic breakthrough in combating these violations effectively

UNIFIKASI Jurnal Ilmu HukumVol. 11(02)
Universitas Kuningan (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.