δ<scp><sup>26</sup>Mg</scp> Values of Thirty‐One Geological Reference Materials Analysed by the Critical Mixture Double Spike Technique

Stable Mg delta values (the relative deviation from a certain reference material, e.g., DSM‐3 here and expressed as δ 26 Mg DSM‐3 ) were routinely measured by the sample‐standard bracketing (SSB) method on a multi‐collector ICP‐MS, as only three isotopes (i.e., 24 Mg, 25 Mg and 26 Mg) naturally exist. Due to potential inaccuracy in correcting mass bias during measurements, considerable measurement bias has been reported among laboratories. Recently, a critical mixture double spike (CMDS) technique has been developed and demonstrated to accurately correct mass bias of measurement results with precision of ± 0.03‰ for δ 26 Mg. Here, we measured thirty‐one geological reference materials including igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rocks, sediments and minerals using the CMDS technique, with the purpose of better characterising their δ 26 Mg DSM‐3 values. Aligning with the data previously reported, uncorrected bias, on average measured by ∆ 26 Mg SSB‐CMDS (i.e., δ 26 Mg SSB ‐ δ 26 Mg CMDS ) as ‐0.071 ± 0.092‰ (2 s , n = 42), has been reaffirmed for the traditional SSB method. Such uncorrected bias positively correlates with sample Mg/(Si+Al+Ca), and thus may result from the accumulative effect of residual matrix elements. The new data set herein can aid future inter‐laboratory comparison and data quality control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12598
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

δ26Mg Values of Thirty‐One Geological Reference Materials Analysed by the Critical Mixture Double Spike Technique

Weijuan Yang, Yongsheng He, Yinchu Zhang, Yang Wang et al.
4 citations
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
9.92
article

δ26Mg Values of Thirty‐One Geological Reference Materials Analysed by the Critical Mixture Double Spike Technique

Weijuan Yang, Yongsheng He, Yinchu Zhang, Yang Wang, Shiying Zhang, Keming Qu, Shan Ke
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Stable Mg delta values (the relative deviation from a certain reference material, e.g., DSM‐3 here and expressed as δ 26 Mg DSM‐3 ) were routinely measured by the sample‐standard bracketing (SSB) method on a multi‐collector ICP‐MS, as only three isotopes (i.e., 24 Mg, 25 Mg and 26 Mg) naturally exist. Due to potential inaccuracy in correcting mass bias during measurements, considerable measurement bias has been reported among laboratories. Recently, a critical mixture double spike (CMDS) technique has been developed and demonstrated to accurately correct mass bias of measurement results with precision of ± 0.03‰ for δ 26 Mg. Here, we measured thirty‐one geological reference materials including igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rocks, sediments and minerals using the CMDS technique, with the purpose of better characterising their δ 26 Mg DSM‐3 values. Aligning with the data previously reported, uncorrected bias, on average measured by ∆ 26 Mg SSB‐CMDS (i.e., δ 26 Mg SSB ‐ δ 26 Mg CMDS ) as ‐0.071 ± 0.092‰ (2 s , n = 42), has been reaffirmed for the traditional SSB method. Such uncorrected bias positively correlates with sample Mg/(Si+Al+Ca), and thus may result from the accumulative effect of residual matrix elements. The new data set herein can aid future inter‐laboratory comparison and data quality control.

Geostandards and Geoanalytical ResearchVol. 49(2)
China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.