Characteristics of Quality Improvement Projects in Health Services: A Systematic Scoping Review

Existing QI publications lack sufficient detail to replicate interventions. Using a model or framework to guide the conduct of a QI-activity may support a more robustly designed and well-conducted project. The variation of reporting characteristics suggests that future research should focus on the development of a pragmatic tool for use by front-line clinicians to support consistent and rigorous conduct of QI projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12670
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characteristics of Quality Improvement Projects in Health Services: A Systematic Scoping Review

Hanan Khalil, Mary‐Anne Ramis, Deeksha Verma, Caroline de Moel‐Mandel et al.
3 citations
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
8.45
article

Characteristics of Quality Improvement Projects in Health Services: A Systematic Scoping Review

Hanan Khalil, Mary‐Anne Ramis, Deeksha Verma, Caroline de Moel‐Mandel, Jessica E. Opie, Kathryn Kynoch, Ritin Fernandez
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Existing QI publications lack sufficient detail to replicate interventions. Using a model or framework to guide the conduct of a QI-activity may support a more robustly designed and well-conducted project. The variation of reporting characteristics suggests that future research should focus on the development of a pragmatic tool for use by front-line clinicians to support consistent and rigorous conduct of QI projects.

Journal of Evidence-Based MedicineVol. 18(1)
Mater Health Services (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), University of the Sunshine Coast (AU), La Trobe University (AU), Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
8.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.