Contesting Captions: Netflix, Fan Campaigns, and the Labor of Access

This article theorizes the work of deaf fans and audiences in securing streaming video captions, which it names the labor of access. While prior scholarship on captions tends to emphasize policy and regulation, streaming video lacks the legislative framework for disability access seen with televisual captions in the United States. Drawing on disability studies and fan studies, this article shifts focus to fan campaigns, which become a central site for renegotiating industry accessibility practices in the absence of regulatory oversight. Using Netflix as a case study, it chronicles how audience campaigns contribute to both the company’s initial provision of streaming captions and the ongoing work of captioning quality control. It then argues that fan-driven access victories in the era of global streaming are uneven and contingent: a successful captioning campaign in one context has no necessary impact in others.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Television & New Media
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764251314178
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contesting Captions: Netflix, Fan Campaigns, and the Labor of Access

Kelsey Cameron
1 citations
Television & New Media
Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
10.42
article

Contesting Captions: Netflix, Fan Campaigns, and the Labor of Access

Kelsey Cameron
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article theorizes the work of deaf fans and audiences in securing streaming video captions, which it names the labor of access. While prior scholarship on captions tends to emphasize policy and regulation, streaming video lacks the legislative framework for disability access seen with televisual captions in the United States. Drawing on disability studies and fan studies, this article shifts focus to fan campaigns, which become a central site for renegotiating industry accessibility practices in the absence of regulatory oversight. Using Netflix as a case study, it chronicles how audience campaigns contribute to both the company’s initial provision of streaming captions and the ongoing work of captioning quality control. It then argues that fan-driven access victories in the era of global streaming are uneven and contingent: a successful captioning campaign in one context has no necessary impact in others.

Television & New MediaVol. 26(5)
University of South Carolina (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
10.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.