Test–Retest Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Photoplethysmography Finger Sensor to Collect Measures of Heart Rate Variability

The purpose of the current study was to determine the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of a photoplethysmography (PPG) finger sensor when collecting heart rate variability (HRV) metrics in reference to electrocardiography (ECG) and heart rate monitor (HRM) devices. Five minutes of R-R interval data were collected from 45 participants (23 females; age: 23.13 ± 4.45 yrs; body mass index: 25.39 ± 4.13 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) in the supine and seated positions in testing sessions 48 h apart. <i>Moderate-to-excellent</i> test-retest reliability of the HRV data collected from the PPG sensor was identified (ICC<sub>2,1</sub> = 0.60-0.93). Additionally, similar standard errors of the mean, coefficient of variation, and minimal detectable change metrics were observed across all devices. Statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) differences were identified in the HRV data between the PPG sensor and ECG and HRM devices; however, these differences were interpreted as <i>trivial-to-small</i> (<i>g</i> = 0.00-0.59). Further, the PPG sensor tended to only overestimate HRV metrics by <0.5 ms and <i>near perfect</i> relationships (<i>r</i> = 0.91-1.00) and <i>very large-to-near perfect</i> agreement (CCC = 0.81-1.00) were identified between collection methods. The PPG sensor demonstrated adequate test-retest reliability and concurrent validity in both the supine and seated resting positions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sports
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13020029
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Test–Retest Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Photoplethysmography Finger Sensor to Collect Measures of Heart Rate Variability

David J. Cornell, Thomas J. Sherriff, Donald W. Rogers, Andreas T. Himariotis et al.
4 citations
Sports
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
5.55
article

Test–Retest Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Photoplethysmography Finger Sensor to Collect Measures of Heart Rate Variability

David J. Cornell, Thomas J. Sherriff, Donald W. Rogers, Andreas T. Himariotis, Quentin J. Proulx, Sabrina E. Noel, Megan T. Duong
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to determine the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of a photoplethysmography (PPG) finger sensor when collecting heart rate variability (HRV) metrics in reference to electrocardiography (ECG) and heart rate monitor (HRM) devices. Five minutes of R-R interval data were collected from 45 participants (23 females; age: 23.13 ± 4.45 yrs; body mass index: 25.39 ± 4.13 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) in the supine and seated positions in testing sessions 48 h apart. <i>Moderate-to-excellent</i> test-retest reliability of the HRV data collected from the PPG sensor was identified (ICC<sub>2,1</sub> = 0.60-0.93). Additionally, similar standard errors of the mean, coefficient of variation, and minimal detectable change metrics were observed across all devices. Statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) differences were identified in the HRV data between the PPG sensor and ECG and HRM devices; however, these differences were interpreted as <i>trivial-to-small</i> (<i>g</i> = 0.00-0.59). Further, the PPG sensor tended to only overestimate HRV metrics by <0.5 ms and <i>near perfect</i> relationships (<i>r</i> = 0.91-1.00) and <i>very large-to-near perfect</i> agreement (CCC = 0.81-1.00) were identified between collection methods. The PPG sensor demonstrated adequate test-retest reliability and concurrent validity in both the supine and seated resting positions.

SportsVol. 13(2)
University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
5.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.