The Extension of the Criminal Prosecution

Criminal prosecution is the first, mandatory and essential, non-public, predominantly written and non-contradictory phase of the criminal proceedings, through which the criminal investigation bodies carry out pre-trial procedural activities. The extension of the criminal prosecution concerns the situation in which it is necessary to modify the procedural framework if, after gathering evidence, the criminal investigation bodies may discover that the person under investigation had committed several acts provided for by criminal law for which the in rem criminal prosecution was not initiated, or that the act under investigation had been committed by several persons who were not considered at the beginning of the investigation. The starting point of this paper is the presentation of the hypotheses, depending on the stage of the procedure in which the procedural framework is modified, as well as the issues that may arise in practice in situations where the prosecution authorities do not proceed with the extension of the criminal prosecution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Series VII Social Sciences • Law
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31926/but.ssl.2024.17.66.3.26
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Evidence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Extension of the Criminal Prosecution

Constantin Ioan Gliga
Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Series VII Social Sciences • Law
Criminal Law and Evidence
article

The Extension of the Criminal Prosecution

Constantin Ioan Gliga
article en

Abstract

Criminal prosecution is the first, mandatory and essential, non-public, predominantly written and non-contradictory phase of the criminal proceedings, through which the criminal investigation bodies carry out pre-trial procedural activities. The extension of the criminal prosecution concerns the situation in which it is necessary to modify the procedural framework if, after gathering evidence, the criminal investigation bodies may discover that the person under investigation had committed several acts provided for by criminal law for which the in rem criminal prosecution was not initiated, or that the act under investigation had been committed by several persons who were not considered at the beginning of the investigation. The starting point of this paper is the presentation of the hypotheses, depending on the stage of the procedure in which the procedural framework is modified, as well as the issues that may arise in practice in situations where the prosecution authorities do not proceed with the extension of the criminal prosecution.

Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Series VII Social Sciences • Law
Transylvania University of Brașov (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Criminal Law and Evidence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Extension of the Criminal Prosecution — Constantin Ioan Gliga · Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Series VII Social Sciences • Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS