On the Arabic Translations of Eutocius’ Commentary on Book II of Archimedes’ Sphere and Cylinder

In the 9th century, parts of Eutocius’ commentary on Book II of Archimedes’ Sphere and Cylinder were translated into Arabic. Most extant manuscripts of these trans- lations contain only fragments. However, one manuscript, Escorial, Árabe 960, contains the longest known Arabic text of Eutocius’ commentary, at 41 folios long. Comparison with the Greek text reveals that the Arabic text in Escorial 960 is composed of the translations of two disjoint parts of Eutocius’ commentary, on Sphere and Cylinder II.1 and II.4. A comparison of various mathematical terms used in the two parts, which I call Text A and Text B, shows that they differ systematically, and were therefore probably translated by different individuals, in different scholarly contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Suhayl Journal for the History of the Exact and Natural Sciences in Islamic Civilisation
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1344/suhayl2024.21.3
Primary Topic
Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Arabic Translations of Eutocius’ Commentary on Book II of Archimedes’ Sphere and Cylinder

Emre Coşkun
Suhayl Journal for the History of the Exact and Natural Sciences in Islamic Civilisation
Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
article

On the Arabic Translations of Eutocius’ Commentary on Book II of Archimedes’ Sphere and Cylinder

Emre Coşkun
article en

Abstract

In the 9th century, parts of Eutocius’ commentary on Book II of Archimedes’ Sphere and Cylinder were translated into Arabic. Most extant manuscripts of these trans- lations contain only fragments. However, one manuscript, Escorial, Árabe 960, contains the longest known Arabic text of Eutocius’ commentary, at 41 folios long. Comparison with the Greek text reveals that the Arabic text in Escorial 960 is composed of the translations of two disjoint parts of Eutocius’ commentary, on Sphere and Cylinder II.1 and II.4. A comparison of various mathematical terms used in the two parts, which I call Text A and Text B, shows that they differ systematically, and were therefore probably translated by different individuals, in different scholarly contexts.

Suhayl Journal for the History of the Exact and Natural Sciences in Islamic CivilisationVol. 21
Middle East Technical University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.