Reasonable Congruence between Charges Pressed and those Proved at Trial in Criminal Procedure Matters in Colombia According to the Adversarial System Characteristics

The congruence principle in criminal proceedings is the factual and legal correlation between the conviction and the charge. In terms of the current Colombian Code of Criminal Procedure, this correlation must occur between the counts contained in the indictment and those in the conviction and between the crimes for which a sentence is requested and those in the conviction. The problem identified in the analysis of the congruence principle in the Colombian criminal procedure lies in the possible lack of adequacy between the legislation establishing this principle and the characteristics of the adopted adversarial criminal procedural system. Through basic legal research, the characteristics of the Colombian adversarial criminal procedural system and the Supreme Court of Justice are discussed and compared with countries such as Argentina, Chile, Mexico, Puerto Rico, the United States, Germany, and Spain, identifying that the Spanish system applies to Colombia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Via Inveniendi Et Iudicandi
Published
2024-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15332/19090528.10061
Primary Topic
Legal processes and jurisprudence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reasonable Congruence between Charges Pressed and those Proved at Trial in Criminal Procedure Matters in Colombia According to the Adversarial System Characteristics

Santiago Andrés Daza Lora, Julio Ballesteros Sánchez, Alfonso Daza González
Via Inveniendi Et Iudicandi
Legal processes and jurisprudence
article

Reasonable Congruence between Charges Pressed and those Proved at Trial in Criminal Procedure Matters in Colombia According to the Adversarial System Characteristics

Santiago Andrés Daza Lora, Julio Ballesteros Sánchez, Alfonso Daza González
article en

Abstract

The congruence principle in criminal proceedings is the factual and legal correlation between the conviction and the charge. In terms of the current Colombian Code of Criminal Procedure, this correlation must occur between the counts contained in the indictment and those in the conviction and between the crimes for which a sentence is requested and those in the conviction. The problem identified in the analysis of the congruence principle in the Colombian criminal procedure lies in the possible lack of adequacy between the legislation establishing this principle and the characteristics of the adopted adversarial criminal procedural system. Through basic legal research, the characteristics of the Colombian adversarial criminal procedural system and the Supreme Court of Justice are discussed and compared with countries such as Argentina, Chile, Mexico, Puerto Rico, the United States, Germany, and Spain, identifying that the Spanish system applies to Colombia.

Via Inveniendi Et IudicandiVol. 19(1)
Universidad de Salamanca (ES), Universidad Libre de Colombia (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Legal processes and jurisprudence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.