The Hidden Dimension of the Protection Granted as a Result of Filing a Complaint with an Administrative Court (Reflections on the Act of Withdrawal of Countersignature by the Prime Minister

Following a complaint to an administrative court by two judges, the Prime Minister used the self-revision procedure and revoked his countersignature of the Presi-dent’s official act. This is a true precedent in the history of Polish constitutionalism. Yet, the permissibility of judicial review of presidential acts performed in individual cases should not give rise to any doubts. This is because such acts are subject to the general control regime set forth in the Act of 30 August 2002 – Law on Proceed-ings before Administrative Courts. What we can learn from other judicial systems indicates that the acts of central executive authorities are not, with some exceptions, exempt from such supervision. An analysis of the judicial decisions of, for instance, the Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic, which recognises its jurisdiction over appointments of judges serves as a convincing example.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Krytyka Prawa
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.732
Primary Topic
Polish Law and Legal System
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Hidden Dimension of the Protection Granted as a Result of Filing a Complaint with an Administrative Court (Reflections on the Act of Withdrawal of Countersignature by the Prime Minister

Zbigniew R. Kmiecik
Krytyka Prawa
Polish Law and Legal System
article

The Hidden Dimension of the Protection Granted as a Result of Filing a Complaint with an Administrative Court (Reflections on the Act of Withdrawal of Countersignature by the Prime Minister

Zbigniew R. Kmiecik
article en

Abstract

Following a complaint to an administrative court by two judges, the Prime Minister used the self-revision procedure and revoked his countersignature of the Presi-dent’s official act. This is a true precedent in the history of Polish constitutionalism. Yet, the permissibility of judicial review of presidential acts performed in individual cases should not give rise to any doubts. This is because such acts are subject to the general control regime set forth in the Act of 30 August 2002 – Law on Proceed-ings before Administrative Courts. What we can learn from other judicial systems indicates that the acts of central executive authorities are not, with some exceptions, exempt from such supervision. An analysis of the judicial decisions of, for instance, the Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic, which recognises its jurisdiction over appointments of judges serves as a convincing example.

Krytyka PrawaVol. 16(4)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Polish Law and Legal System
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.