The Impact of the Judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union Following Preliminary Rulings on the Decisions Issued by the Supreme Administrative Court in Tax Cases

The article analyses CJEU judgments passed as a result of preliminary rulings and their impact on the judicial decisions of the Supreme Administrative Court. Admini­strative courts are highly committed to and keen on referring preliminary rulings to the CJEU, which is a noteworthy fact. In assessing the implementation of the right legal instruments, the CJEU, by way of its judgments, often grants protection to taxable persons. These judgments have often resulted in legislative changes or changes in the interpretation of legal provisions. In some cases, the previous line of judicial decisions of the Supreme Administrative Court is legitimised and proven as correct. What deserves particular attention is the CJEU’s existing judicial practice of dealing with tax law abuse cases, which is used by the SAC when examining cases involving tax carousels.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Krytyka Prawa
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.734
Primary Topic
Taxation and Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of the Judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union Following Preliminary Rulings on the Decisions Issued by the Supreme Administrative Court in Tax Cases

Artur Mudrecki
Krytyka Prawa
Taxation and Legal Issues
article

The Impact of the Judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union Following Preliminary Rulings on the Decisions Issued by the Supreme Administrative Court in Tax Cases

Artur Mudrecki
article en

Abstract

The article analyses CJEU judgments passed as a result of preliminary rulings and their impact on the judicial decisions of the Supreme Administrative Court. Admini­strative courts are highly committed to and keen on referring preliminary rulings to the CJEU, which is a noteworthy fact. In assessing the implementation of the right legal instruments, the CJEU, by way of its judgments, often grants protection to taxable persons. These judgments have often resulted in legislative changes or changes in the interpretation of legal provisions. In some cases, the previous line of judicial decisions of the Supreme Administrative Court is legitimised and proven as correct. What deserves particular attention is the CJEU’s existing judicial practice of dealing with tax law abuse cases, which is used by the SAC when examining cases involving tax carousels.

Krytyka PrawaVol. 16(4)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Taxation and Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Impact of the Judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union Following Preliminary Rulings on the Decisions Issued by the Supreme Administrative Court in Tax Cases — Artur Mudrecki · Krytyka Prawa (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS