Position crime during the Great Patriotic War

The article examines the phenomenon of economic crime among executives of government bodies, institutions and enterprises of various departmental affiliations in the context of social upheavals caused by the consequences of total war. The most common types of torts are characterized. The circumstances and motives that prompted the commission of acts dictated by selfish considerations and entailing administrative or criminal penalties are analyzed. The measures of influence from the Party Control Commission and justice bodies against subjects who violated the established rules and regulations are presented. The behavioral strategies that were used by the latter in order to resolve the legal conflicts that arose are described. The reasons that contributed to the mitigation or cancellation of punishment for the offenders are clarified. It is established that membership in the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks), official status, professional qualifications and past merits were factors that facilitated both the organization of economic crimes and the evasion of responsibility in the event of possible exposure. From the perspective of criminal economic anthropology, criteria are proposed for determining the types of embezzlers of state property.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History and modern perspectives
Published
2024-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33693/2658-4654-2024-6-4-64-73
Primary Topic
Military History and Strategy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Position crime during the Great Patriotic War

A.A. Pass
History and modern perspectives
Military History and Strategy
article

Position crime during the Great Patriotic War

A.A. Pass
article en

Abstract

The article examines the phenomenon of economic crime among executives of government bodies, institutions and enterprises of various departmental affiliations in the context of social upheavals caused by the consequences of total war. The most common types of torts are characterized. The circumstances and motives that prompted the commission of acts dictated by selfish considerations and entailing administrative or criminal penalties are analyzed. The measures of influence from the Party Control Commission and justice bodies against subjects who violated the established rules and regulations are presented. The behavioral strategies that were used by the latter in order to resolve the legal conflicts that arose are described. The reasons that contributed to the mitigation or cancellation of punishment for the offenders are clarified. It is established that membership in the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks), official status, professional qualifications and past merits were factors that facilitated both the organization of economic crimes and the evasion of responsibility in the event of possible exposure. From the perspective of criminal economic anthropology, criteria are proposed for determining the types of embezzlers of state property.

History and modern perspectivesVol. 6(4)
Chelyabinsk State University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Military History and Strategy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.