Superquestions and some ways to answer them
Abstract Earnings Conference Calls, in which corporate management are quizzed by investment analysts, are a particularly rich source of a phenomenon of question-asking that, though less prevalent, also occurs in many other genres of discourse. When a participant in a dialogue is allowed to ask more than one question consecutively — particularly in order to extend or refine or recast — we see that respondents often react by answering either one or more of the individual questions, or by answering a question that was never actually asked, but which is related to the explicit questions and to other content introduced in the turn. We call this overarching implicit question a superquestion , and explore how they can be formed, how they can be answered, how they trigger argumentation, and, indeed, how they can be dodged.
Authors
- Andrea Rocci (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7156-5402)
- Chris Reed (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6849-1374)
- Eimear Maguire
- Giulia D’Agostino (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8918-1440)
- Ella Schad
- Costanza Lucchini
Institutions
- University of Dundee (GB)
- Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Argumentation in Context
- Published
- 2024-12-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.24002.dag
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.69