China's Evolving Response to the US-Led International Order and its Impact on Global Governance

China's rise as an emerging power challenges the US-led international order through the counter-institutionalisation approach.Eventually, the existing global governance is fragmented by China's counter-institutional approach.Global governance and international order are closely related and interconnected concepts that play a crucial role in addressing global challenges by establishing global norms and maintaining stability in the international system.China's approach to global governance is twopronged: one is active engagement in existing global governance institutions and the second is establishing new institutions such as the New Development Bank formerly referred to as the BRICS Development Bank, the proposed Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership trade agreement and most prominently the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB).This research utilises Michael Zurn's Global Governance Theory to trace China's response to existing global governance institutions and its implications on global governance.This theory explains that the existing global institutions' lack of legitimacy by not representing the interest of all states has created space for states to open new counter-institutions.This response involves states seeking alternative institutions that better serve

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
IPRI Journal
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31945/iprij.240203
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China's Evolving Response to the US-Led International Order and its Impact on Global Governance

Asia Maqsood
IPRI Journal
International Development and Aid
article

China's Evolving Response to the US-Led International Order and its Impact on Global Governance

Asia Maqsood
article en

Abstract

China's rise as an emerging power challenges the US-led international order through the counter-institutionalisation approach.Eventually, the existing global governance is fragmented by China's counter-institutional approach.Global governance and international order are closely related and interconnected concepts that play a crucial role in addressing global challenges by establishing global norms and maintaining stability in the international system.China's approach to global governance is twopronged: one is active engagement in existing global governance institutions and the second is establishing new institutions such as the New Development Bank formerly referred to as the BRICS Development Bank, the proposed Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership trade agreement and most prominently the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB).This research utilises Michael Zurn's Global Governance Theory to trace China's response to existing global governance institutions and its implications on global governance.This theory explains that the existing global institutions' lack of legitimacy by not representing the interest of all states has created space for states to open new counter-institutions.This response involves states seeking alternative institutions that better serve

IPRI JournalVol. XXIV(02)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.