The Marikana Commission of Inquiry: An Ambiguous Experiment with ‘Truth’ and ‘Justice’

ABSTRACT The Marikana Commission of Inquiry was established to investigate the events of 16 August 2012, when the South African Police Service shot and killed 34 striking mineworkers at the Lonmin Plc platinum mine. Conceived as a standard commission of inquiry to examine the circumstances surrounding this ‘tragic incident’, widely referred to as the Marikana massacre, the Commission adopted the official motto ‘Truth, Restoration, Justice’. This motto echoed the discourse of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, a quintessential transitional justice body. This article analyses the Marikana Commission of Inquiry through the lens of transitional justice, despite its establishment occurring long after South Africa’s transition to democracy. It interrogates the appropriation of transitional justice discourse within the Commission, highlighting fundamental ambiguities in its role and objectives. By situating the Marikana Commission within the broader landscape of truth and justice ‘experiments’ addressing (post)colonial state violence, the article argues that while the Commission attempted to expand its focus to encompass transitional justice goals, its overly legalistic approach to truth-seeking and perfunctory engagement with victims ultimately undermined its restorative potential.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Transitional Justice
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijae041
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Marikana Commission of Inquiry: An Ambiguous Experiment with ‘Truth’ and ‘Justice’

Claire-Anne Louise Lester
International Journal of Transitional Justice
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

The Marikana Commission of Inquiry: An Ambiguous Experiment with ‘Truth’ and ‘Justice’

Claire-Anne Louise Lester
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Marikana Commission of Inquiry was established to investigate the events of 16 August 2012, when the South African Police Service shot and killed 34 striking mineworkers at the Lonmin Plc platinum mine. Conceived as a standard commission of inquiry to examine the circumstances surrounding this ‘tragic incident’, widely referred to as the Marikana massacre, the Commission adopted the official motto ‘Truth, Restoration, Justice’. This motto echoed the discourse of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, a quintessential transitional justice body. This article analyses the Marikana Commission of Inquiry through the lens of transitional justice, despite its establishment occurring long after South Africa’s transition to democracy. It interrogates the appropriation of transitional justice discourse within the Commission, highlighting fundamental ambiguities in its role and objectives. By situating the Marikana Commission within the broader landscape of truth and justice ‘experiments’ addressing (post)colonial state violence, the article argues that while the Commission attempted to expand its focus to encompass transitional justice goals, its overly legalistic approach to truth-seeking and perfunctory engagement with victims ultimately undermined its restorative potential.

International Journal of Transitional JusticeVol. 19(2)
Princeton University, University of Pennsylvania, National Institute for the Humanities and Social Sciences, National Research Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.