REVERSE ENGINEERING OF THE METAL SPINNING PROCESS FOR CONICAL ANGLE 163° USING FEM WITH SIMUFACT FORMING

The process of metal spinning is performed based on years of experience and empirical research. For workpieces with complex shapes, this is a problematic and time-consuming task. The use of numerical studies is intended to ease the design of the metal spinning process. This article presents the results of shaping a conical product with an angle of 163° for two materials: AA 1050A and DC04 steel. The work under laboratory conditions was carried out using the MWS 200 machine. FEM simulations were performed in the Simufact Forming program. The testing methodology consisted of 4 consecutive stages. First, the spinning process was carried out with AA 1050A material. Second, boundary conditions were selected for FEM simulation. The third, spinning FEM tests were performed for DC04 steel. The fourth, metal spinning process tests were performed with DC04 steel. The influence of selected process parameters on the obtained product and the correlation with FEM studies are described. The results obtained showed that the discrepancy between laboratory and numerical tests is dependent on the material tested and its mechanical properties. In the case of aluminum, which is easier to form, it was possible to use an identical trajectory of the forming roll with an accuracy of 2.25%. As the mechanical parameters of the material increase, the differences between laboratory and numerical results increase. Consequently, a gap correction was necessary to achieve convergence. The value of the trajectory correction was determined by comparing the laboratory results obtained with the numerical results. The introduction of the correction resulted in a convergence between FEM and laboratory tests of 2.06%.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Modern Manufacturing Technologies
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54684/ijmmt.2024.16.2.121
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

REVERSE ENGINEERING OF THE METAL SPINNING PROCESS FOR CONICAL ANGLE 163° USING FEM WITH SIMUFACT FORMING

T. Gądek, Marcin Majewski, Bartosz Sułek
2 citations
International Journal of Modern Manufacturing Technologies
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
0.70
article

REVERSE ENGINEERING OF THE METAL SPINNING PROCESS FOR CONICAL ANGLE 163° USING FEM WITH SIMUFACT FORMING

T. Gądek, Marcin Majewski, Bartosz Sułek
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The process of metal spinning is performed based on years of experience and empirical research. For workpieces with complex shapes, this is a problematic and time-consuming task. The use of numerical studies is intended to ease the design of the metal spinning process. This article presents the results of shaping a conical product with an angle of 163° for two materials: AA 1050A and DC04 steel. The work under laboratory conditions was carried out using the MWS 200 machine. FEM simulations were performed in the Simufact Forming program. The testing methodology consisted of 4 consecutive stages. First, the spinning process was carried out with AA 1050A material. Second, boundary conditions were selected for FEM simulation. The third, spinning FEM tests were performed for DC04 steel. The fourth, metal spinning process tests were performed with DC04 steel. The influence of selected process parameters on the obtained product and the correlation with FEM studies are described. The results obtained showed that the discrepancy between laboratory and numerical tests is dependent on the material tested and its mechanical properties. In the case of aluminum, which is easier to form, it was possible to use an identical trajectory of the forming roll with an accuracy of 2.25%. As the mechanical parameters of the material increase, the differences between laboratory and numerical results increase. Consequently, a gap correction was necessary to achieve convergence. The value of the trajectory correction was determined by comparing the laboratory results obtained with the numerical results. The introduction of the correction resulted in a convergence between FEM and laboratory tests of 2.06%.

International Journal of Modern Manufacturing TechnologiesVol. 16(2)
Politechnika Lódzka
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
0.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.