Anonymous survey results of ophthalmology residents of Russian medical universities on the status of their visual analyzer

BACKGROUND: A widespread visual impairment among medical students is known, but there are no data on the ophthalmic status of clinical residents. AIM: To carry out an assessment of the visual analyzer status in Russian medical universities graduates who begin the clinical residency according to the specialty 31.08.59 Ophthalmology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous residents’ online survey was conducted in 15 universities from 14 cities using an original interactive questionnaire. Responses were received from 249 respondents (mostly females: n = 188, 75.5%; mean age 24.80 ± 0.06 years). To compare, we used previously published data on a survey of senior students from 5 Russian medical universities, including 549 respondents (425 females, 77.4%; mean age 22.4 ± 0.06 years). RESULTS: In comparison to students, residents were significantly more likely to rate their vision as excellent (20.8% and 28.9%, respectively, p = 0.01), to report emmetropia (16.2% versus 26.9%, p 0.001), to deny continuing vision deterioration (33.0% and 43.5%, p 0.005), to rate higher the importance of good vision (9.25 ± 0.06 and 9.73 ± 0.05 conditional points, respectively, p 0.01). Students significantly more often did not know the meaning of the “clinical refraction” term (2.6% and 0.4%, respectively, p = 0.04), more often reported vision problems interfering with their studies (26.2% and 15.7%, p = 0.01), and reported ongoing vision deterioration (57.9% versus 45.0%, p 0.001). Otherwise, survey results were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Visual impairments are widespread among clinical residents-ophthalmologists of Russian medical universities, 58.2% of the responders had ametropia (including 56.1% of myopia), 28.5% had astigmatism, 3.6% had other ocular conditions. The majority of survey participants (59.8%) used or felt a need in optical correction, 19.7% rated their vision as “poor” or “very poor”, about a half (45.0%) believed their vision to worsen during recent years, and about as much (46.6%) reported that they experience limitations in everyday life related to decreased vision. Insufficient awareness of a part of the responders about their vision, and in some responders, a lack in basic ophthalmological knowledge were revealed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ophthalmology Reports
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17816/ov634872
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anonymous survey results of ophthalmology residents of Russian medical universities on the status of their visual analyzer

А. Ш. Загидуллина, С. А. Коротких, Т. В. Гаврилова, V. B. Antonyan et al.
Ophthalmology Reports
Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
article

Anonymous survey results of ophthalmology residents of Russian medical universities on the status of their visual analyzer

А. Ш. Загидуллина, С. А. Коротких, Т. В. Гаврилова, V. B. Antonyan, А. Ж. Фурсова, E. V. Bobykin, Д. Ф. Покровский, Т. Г. Каменских, О. И. Лебедев, П. А. Нечипоренко, Е. А. Дроздова, Vadim Ya. Krokhalev, А. Е. Апрелев, Svetlana R. Avkhadeeva, Svetlana Chistyakova, Mariia N. Ponomareva, Liliya Alekseevna Filina, Е. В. Тур, Ya. A. Martusevich, I. B. Medvedev, M. A. Kovalevskaya, Natalia G. Zumbulidze, S. Yu. Astakhov, P. N. Pozdnyakova, Aleksandr V. Surov, Nataliya Yu. Beldovskaya, Saida B. Ismailova, L. I. Solovyeva
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A widespread visual impairment among medical students is known, but there are no data on the ophthalmic status of clinical residents. AIM: To carry out an assessment of the visual analyzer status in Russian medical universities graduates who begin the clinical residency according to the specialty 31.08.59 Ophthalmology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous residents’ online survey was conducted in 15 universities from 14 cities using an original interactive questionnaire. Responses were received from 249 respondents (mostly females: n = 188, 75.5%; mean age 24.80 ± 0.06 years). To compare, we used previously published data on a survey of senior students from 5 Russian medical universities, including 549 respondents (425 females, 77.4%; mean age 22.4 ± 0.06 years). RESULTS: In comparison to students, residents were significantly more likely to rate their vision as excellent (20.8% and 28.9%, respectively, p = 0.01), to report emmetropia (16.2% versus 26.9%, p 0.001), to deny continuing vision deterioration (33.0% and 43.5%, p 0.005), to rate higher the importance of good vision (9.25 ± 0.06 and 9.73 ± 0.05 conditional points, respectively, p 0.01). Students significantly more often did not know the meaning of the “clinical refraction” term (2.6% and 0.4%, respectively, p = 0.04), more often reported vision problems interfering with their studies (26.2% and 15.7%, p = 0.01), and reported ongoing vision deterioration (57.9% versus 45.0%, p 0.001). Otherwise, survey results were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Visual impairments are widespread among clinical residents-ophthalmologists of Russian medical universities, 58.2% of the responders had ametropia (including 56.1% of myopia), 28.5% had astigmatism, 3.6% had other ocular conditions. The majority of survey participants (59.8%) used or felt a need in optical correction, 19.7% rated their vision as “poor” or “very poor”, about a half (45.0%) believed their vision to worsen during recent years, and about as much (46.6%) reported that they experience limitations in everyday life related to decreased vision. Insufficient awareness of a part of the responders about their vision, and in some responders, a lack in basic ophthalmological knowledge were revealed.

Ophthalmology ReportsVol. 17(4)
Novosibirsk State Medical University (RU), Omsk State Medical University (RU), Siberian State Medical University (RU), First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg (RU), Voronezh State Medical Academy named after N.N. Burdenko (RU), Chelyabinsk State Medical Academy (RU), Perm State Medical Academy (RU), Ural State Medical University (RU), Saratov State Medical University (RU), Bashkir State Medical University (RU), Orenburg State Medical Academy (RU), North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov (RU), V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University (UA), Tyumen State Medical University (RU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.