20-րդ դարի մոդեռնիստական և պոստմոդեռնիստական գրականության էկզիստենցիալ մեկնաբանությունները

The modernist individual is seen as a Creator, shaping their own existence through actions and perceptions, facing the following dilemma of Western thought: despite the absurdity and meaninglessness of life, humans possess unfettered freedom to act. Everything is meaningless, but through the prism of death, a new creation begins, marked by the humanistic courage to act and create in meaninglessness. As Voltaire said: “If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him. Religion is secondary but necessary: people need guidance.” The model of original sin in the light of modernism is transformed into an “accepted, reconciled” model of thinking, where action loses its significance. This aligns with the general characteristics of characters in modernist literature, for the character here is a movement of thought, therefore the sin they commit is also simply a movement of thought. At the same time, the symbol of the "Tree of Knowledge" is an attempt to combine the symbolism of Frazer's "Golden Bough" and the "Tree of Life", which blurs the boundaries between past and present, accomplished and unfinished, showing the paradox of a modern character who is everywhere and nowhere, and their very existence, depends on the acknowledgment of sin.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foreign Languages in Higher Education
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46991/flhe.2024.28.2.213
Primary Topic
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

20-րդ դարի մոդեռնիստական և պոստմոդեռնիստական գրականության էկզիստենցիալ մեկնաբանությունները

Ամալյա Սողոմոնյան
Foreign Languages in Higher Education
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
article

20-րդ դարի մոդեռնիստական և պոստմոդեռնիստական գրականության էկզիստենցիալ մեկնաբանությունները

Ամալյա Սողոմոնյան
article en

Abstract

The modernist individual is seen as a Creator, shaping their own existence through actions and perceptions, facing the following dilemma of Western thought: despite the absurdity and meaninglessness of life, humans possess unfettered freedom to act. Everything is meaningless, but through the prism of death, a new creation begins, marked by the humanistic courage to act and create in meaninglessness. As Voltaire said: “If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him. Religion is secondary but necessary: people need guidance.” The model of original sin in the light of modernism is transformed into an “accepted, reconciled” model of thinking, where action loses its significance. This aligns with the general characteristics of characters in modernist literature, for the character here is a movement of thought, therefore the sin they commit is also simply a movement of thought. At the same time, the symbol of the "Tree of Knowledge" is an attempt to combine the symbolism of Frazer's "Golden Bough" and the "Tree of Life", which blurs the boundaries between past and present, accomplished and unfinished, showing the paradox of a modern character who is everywhere and nowhere, and their very existence, depends on the acknowledgment of sin.

Foreign Languages in Higher EducationVol. 28(2 (37))
Energetický a Průmyslový Holding (Czechia) (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

20-րդ դարի մոդեռնիստական և պոստմոդեռնիստական գրականության էկզիստենցիալ մեկնաբանությունները — Ամալյա Սողոմոնյան · Foreign Languages in Higher Education (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS